Evaluation of organ doses and effective dose according to the ICRP Publication 110 reference male/female phantom and the modified ImPACT CT patient dosimetry

We modified the Imaging Performance Assessment of CT scanners (ImPACT) to evaluate the organ doses and the effective dose based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 110 reference male/female phantom with the Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition scanner. To select the new CT scanner, the measurement results of the CTDI100,c and CTDI100,p for the 160 (head) and the 320 (body) mm polymethylmethacrylate phantoms, respectively, were entered on the Excel worksheet. To compute the organ doses and effective dose of the ICRP reference male/female phantom, the conversion factors obtained by comparison between the organ doses of different types of phantom were applied. The organ doses and the effective dose were almost identical for the ICRP reference male/female and modified ImPACT. The results of this study showed that, with the dose assessment of the ImPACT, the difference in sex influences only testes and ovaries. Because the MIRD‐5 phantom represents a partially hermaphrodite adult, the phantom has the dimensions of the male reference man including testes, ovaries, and uterus but no female breasts, whereas the ICRP male/female phantom includes whole‐body male and female anatomies based on high‐resolution anatomical datasets. The conversion factors can be used to estimate the doses of a male and a female accurately, and efficient dose assessment can be performed with the modified ImPACT. PACS number: 87.53.LY, 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.‐s

[1]  W. S. Snyder,et al.  Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom. , 1974, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Akira Endo,et al.  WAZA-ARI: computational dosimetry system for X-ray CT examinations II: development of web-based system. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[4]  Amy Berrington de González,et al.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries , 2004, The Lancet.

[5]  Tomohiro Asano,et al.  United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 2000 Report , 2001 .

[6]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[7]  P C Shrimpton,et al.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  J. Valentin,et al.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[9]  N Shandala,et al.  Scope of radiological protection control measures. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[10]  T Hasegawa,et al.  Development of a web-based CT dose calculator: WAZA-ARI. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[11]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[12]  Ruairidb Milne Evidence-based purchasing , 1996, Evidence Based Medicine.

[13]  Michiaki Kai,et al.  WAZA-ARI: computational dosimetry system for X-ray CT examinations. I. Radiation transport calculation for organ and tissue doses evaluation using JM phantom. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  J. Valentin,et al.  Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack , 2005, Annals of the ICRP.

[15]  Walter Huda,et al.  Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. , 2008, Radiology.

[16]  Akira Endo,et al.  Effects of Human Model Configuration in Monte Carlo Calculations on Organ Doses from CT Examinations (Selected Papers of the Joint International Conference of Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications and Monte Carlo : SNA + MC 2010) , 2011 .

[17]  W. Paul Segars,et al.  Organ doses, effective doses, and risk indices in adult CT: comparison of four types of reference phantoms across different examination protocols. , 2012, Medical physics.

[18]  D. G. Jones,et al.  Normalised Organ Doses for X Ray Computed Tomography Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques and a Mathematical Anthropomorphic Phantom , 1993 .