En garde: rapid shifts in honeybee, Apis mellifera, guarding behaviour are triggered by onslaught of conspecific intruders

In a recognition context, discriminating agents decide whether to accept or to reject. In the honeybee, entrance guards distinguish between nestmates and intruders. Those below a threshold of dissimilarity are accepted. However, the threshold is dependent on ecological conditions and may shift to become either restrictive or permissive, depending on the frequency of intrusion and cost of admitting an intruder. Previous research on the honeybee has shown that both the number of guards and their acceptance threshold to conspecific non-nestmates can change dramatically over weeks owing to changing nectar availability and robbing intensity. This project investigated whether these changes could also occur rapidly, over minutes, in response to sudden increases in conspecific intruders (robber bees). We induced high levels of intrusion at nest entrances and determined changes in the number of guards, the number of fights per guard, and the acceptance thresholds of guards. Our results show a rapid response within 15 min. At the level of individual guards, acceptance declined from 83 to 55% for nestmates and 67 to 43% for conspecific non-nestmates. Also, per individual guard, mean fights increased from 0.005 to 0.06 fights/guard. At the colony level, the mean number of guards at the entrance rose from 1.9 to 2.3, and overall acceptance in a 3-min trial declined from 74 to 52% for nestmates and 59 to 30% for conspecific non-nestmates. These results show that honeybees can make rapid behavioural shifts at both the colony and the individual levels. (C) 2008 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Robert E. Page,et al.  Division of labor during honey bee colony defense , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  M. West-Eberhard.  KIN RECOGNITION IN ANIMALS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  E. Wilson.  The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[4]  W. Getz.  An analysis of learned kin recognition in hymenoptera , 1982 .

[5]  Aviva E Liebert,et al.  The Action Component of Recognition Systems: A Focus on the Response , 2004 .

[6]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Self-organization in social insects. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[8]  W. G. Holmes.  The early history of Hamiltonian-based research on kin recognition , 2004 .

[9]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[10]  J. Free,et al.  The behaviour of worker honeybees at the hive entrance. , 1951 .

[11]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  The role of floral oils in the nestmate recognition system of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) , 2000 .

[12]  R. Watson,et al.  Context-dependent nestmate discrimination in the paper wasp, Polistes dominulus : a critical test of the optimal acceptance threshold model , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  P. Sherman,et al.  Kin Recognition by Phenotype Matching , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Bruce Waldman.  The Ecology of Kin Recognition , 1988 .

[15]  P. Hepper.  Kin recognition: Introduction , 1991 .

[16]  J. Free,et al.  Pheromones of social bees , 1987 .

[17]  W. G. Holmes,et al.  Conceptual issues and methodology in kin-recognition research : a critical discussion , 2010 .

[18]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Odour transfer in stingless bee marmelada (Frieseomelitta varia) demonstrates that entrance guards use an “undesirable–absent” recognition system , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  R. Johnstone,et al.  The Evolution of Mimicry under Constraints , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[20]  K. Frisch.  The dance language and orientation of bees , 1967 .

[21]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Recognition of Individuals Within and Between Groups of Free-Ranging Vervet Monkeys1 , 1982 .

[22]  H. Reeve,et al.  The Evolution of Conspecific Acceptance Thresholds , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[23]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Social evolution: Kin preference in a social microbe , 2006, Nature.

[24]  J. Free,et al.  The social organization of honeybees , 1977 .

[25]  G. Robinson.  Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[26]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  J. Mateo.  KIN RECOGNITION IN GROUND SQUIRRELS AND OTHER RODENTS , 2003 .

[28]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[29]  U. Maschwitz.  Gefahrenalarmstoffe und Gefahrenalarmierung bei sozialen Hymenopteren , 1964, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[30]  D. Gordon.  The organization of work in social insect colonies , 1996, Nature.

[31]  M. Breed,et al.  Role of Guard Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Nestmate Discrimination and Replacement of Removed Guards , 1992 .

[32]  A. J. Moore,et al.  The guard honey bee: ontogeny and behavioural variability of workers performing a specialized task , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Adaptive shifts in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) guarding behavior support predictions of the acceptance threshold model , 2000 .

[34]  K. Espelie,et al.  Kin recognition pheromones in social wasps: combining chemical and behavioural evidence , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  R. Crozier,et al.  Genetic Intrigues. (Book Reviews: Evolution of Social Insect Colonies. Sex Allocation and Kin Selection.) , 1997 .

[36]  S. Graham,et al.  Honey Bee Nest Thermoregulation: Diversity Promotes Stability , 2004, Science.

[37]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Nest-mate recognition template of guard honeybees (Apis mellifera) is modified by wax comb transfer , 2007, Biology Letters.

[38]  P. Schausberger.  Kin recognition by juvenile predatory mites: prior association or phenotype matching? , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.