Probabilistic Reasoning with Undefined Properties in Ontologically-Based Belief Networks

This paper concerns building probabilistic models with an underlying ontology that defines the classes and properties used in the model. In particular, it considers the problem of reasoning with properties that may not always be defined. Furthermore, we may even be uncertain about whether a property is defined for a given individual. One approach is to explicitly add a value "undefined" to the range of random variables, forming extended belief networks; however, adding an extra value to a random variable's range has a large computational overhead. In this paper, we propose an alternative, ontologically-based belief networks, where all properties are only used when they are defined, and we show how probabilistic reasoning can be carried out without explicitly using the value "undefined" during inference. We prove this is equivalent to reasoning with the corresponding extended belief network and empirically demonstrate that inference becomes more efficient.

[1]  David Poole,et al.  Semantic Science: Ontologies, Data and Probabilistic Theories , 2008, URSW.

[2]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Techniques , 2009 .

[3]  Nevin L. Zhang,et al.  A simple approach to Bayesian network computations , 1994 .

[4]  Rina Dechter,et al.  Bucket elimination: A unifying framework for probabilistic inference , 1996, UAI.

[5]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence , 1974, IFIP Congress.

[6]  Luc De Raedt,et al.  Probabilistic Inductive Logic Programming , 2004, Probabilistic Inductive Logic Programming.

[7]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[8]  Boris Motik,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: structural specification and functional-style syntax , 2008 .

[9]  Ben Taskar,et al.  Introduction to statistical relational learning , 2007 .

[10]  Nevin Lianwen Zhang,et al.  On the Role of Context-Specific Independence in Probabilistic Inference , 1999, IJCAI.

[11]  J. C. Davies Aristotle’s Theory of Definition , 1975, Euphrosyne.

[12]  Craig Boutilier,et al.  Context-Specific Independence in Bayesian Networks , 1996, UAI.

[13]  Ben Taskar,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning) , 2007 .

[14]  Adnan Darwiche,et al.  Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks , 2009 .

[15]  J. Davenport Editor , 1960 .

[16]  Nevin Lianwen Zhang,et al.  Exploiting Contextual Independence In Probabilistic Inference , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[17]  Bernardo Cuenca Grau,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Direct Semantics , 2009 .

[18]  Boris Motik,et al.  OWL 2: The next step for OWL , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[19]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1996) , 2013, ArXiv.

[20]  David Poole,et al.  Ontology Design for Scientific Theories That Make Probabilistic Predictions , 2009, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[21]  Adnan Darwiche,et al.  Recursive conditioning , 2001, Artif. Intell..