The effects of field dependent-independent cognitive style and abrupt rotation of the reference frame on multiple object tracking

The Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task was initially designed by Pylyshyn and Storm (1988) and has been widely used to study the visual attentional mechanisms people use when viewing dynamic scenes. Previous research has usually used this task to explore participants’ abilities to track multiple moving objects in a static reference frame. But more recently, some researchers have started to investigate observers’ tracking performance in nonstable scenes. However, few studies have explored the effects of field dependent-independent cognitive style on tracking tasks from the point of view of individual differences. Previous research has revealed that field dependent-independent cognitive style affects people’s ways of perceiving and thinking. Field-independent individuals rely on an internal reference frame and tend to perceive objects separately from the background, while field-dependent individuals are more likely to rely on an external reference frame and perceive objects as a whole. We tested the effects of field dependent-independent cognitive style and abrupt rotation of the reference frame on tracking performance in the MOT task. This study included two experiments. Experiment 1 compared performance differences between field-independent individuals and field-dependent individuals in the MOT task. Nineteen participants who scored ≥15 in the Embedded Figures Test (EFT) were classified as the extreme field-independent group, and twenty-three participants who scored ≤11 were classified as extreme field-dependent group. The two groups of participants were required to track 3, 4, or 5 targets in a static reference frame. Experiment 2 explored the tracking differences of the two groups in a nonstable reference frame with four targets. The procedure of Experiment 2 was the same as Experiment 1, except that after the motion of 6s in each trial, the reference frame abruptly changed 0°, 20°, or 40°. Meanwhile, the participants still needed to keep track of the targets. The two experiments found significant differences between field-independent individuals and

[1]  Wei Liu-qing,et al.  The effect of identity switch in Multiple Identity Tracking , 2018 .

[2]  Changxu Wu,et al.  Effects of Field Dependence-Independence and Frame of Reference on Navigation Performance Using Multi-dimensional Electronic Maps , 2016 .

[3]  B. Kramarski,et al.  Eye Movement Patterns Characteristic of Cognitive Style. , 2016, Experimental psychology.

[4]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Xuemin Zhang,et al.  Additivity of Feature-Based and Symmetry-Based Grouping Effects in Multiple Object Tracking , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[6]  Markus Huff,et al.  Viewpoint matters: Exploring the involvement of reference frames in multiple object tracking from a developmental perspective , 2016 .

[7]  Jifan Zhou,et al.  Cognitive style modulates conscious but not unconscious thought: Comparing the deliberation-without-attention effect in analytics and wholists , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  Wei Liu-qing,et al.  The Facilitating Effect of Target-Nontarget Categorical Difference in Identity on Multiple Identity Tracking , 2015 .

[9]  Zheng Yuehon.  The impact of field-independent and field-dependent cognitive styles on road scene observing: an eye movement study , 2015 .

[10]  Carol Evans,et al.  Field independence: reviewing the evidence. , 2013, The British journal of educational psychology.

[11]  Markus Huff,et al.  Spatial reference in multiple object tracking. , 2012, Experimental psychology.

[12]  Adriane E Seiffert,et al.  Tracking planets and moons: mechanisms of object tracking revealed with a new paradigm , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Markus Huff,et al.  Eye movements across viewpoint changes in multiple object tracking , 2010 .

[14]  Sanghee Yeo.  Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. , 2010, Korean journal of medical education.

[15]  A. Seiffert.  Attentional tracking across display translations , 2010 .

[16]  Markus Huff,et al.  Tracking multiple objects across abrupt viewpoint changes , 2009 .

[17]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[18]  You Xu-qun.  The Experimental Research about the Influence of Field Cognition Mode on Mental Rotation , 2007 .

[19]  James T Enns,et al.  Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  Field-dependence/independence: cognitive style or perceptual ability? - Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement , 2004 .

[21]  R. T. Pithers,et al.  Cognitive learning style: a review of the field dependent-field independent approach , 2002 .

[22]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  Field dependence–independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test , 2001, Memory.

[23]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.

[24]  S. Yantis.  Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration , 1991 .

[26]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[27]  S. Messick.  The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice , 1984 .

[28]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[29]  D R Goodenough,et al.  Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. , 1981, Psychological issues.

[30]  B. Bergum,et al.  Undergraduate Self-Perceptions of Creativity and Independence , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[31]  C. A. Moore,et al.  FIELD‐DEPENDENT AND FIELD‐INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS , 1975 .

[32]  H. A. Witkin.  A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[33]  J. Kagan.  Reflection--impulsivity: the generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. , 1966, Journal of abnormal psychology.