Learning-based single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction without brain extraction

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) estimates the underlying tissue magnetic susceptibility from MRI gradient-echo phase signal and typically requires several processing steps. These steps involve phase unwrapping, brain volume extraction, background phase removal and solving an ill-posed inverse problem relating the tissue phase to the underlying susceptibility distribution. The resulting susceptibility map is known to suffer from inaccuracy near the edges of the brain tissues, in part due to imperfect brain extraction, edge erosion of the brain tissue and the lack of phase measurement outside the brain. This inaccuracy has thus hindered the application of QSM for measuring susceptibility of tissues near the brain edges, e.g., quantifying cortical layers and generating superficial venography. To address these challenges, we propose a learning-based QSM reconstruction method that directly estimates the magnetic susceptibility from total phase images without the need for brain extraction and background phase removal, referred to as autoQSM. The neural network has a modified U-net structure and is trained using QSM maps computed by a two-step QSM method. 209 healthy subjects with ages ranging from 11 to 82 years were employed for patch-wise network training. The network was validated on data dissimilar to the training data, e.g., in vivo mouse brain data and brains with lesions, which suggests that the network generalized and learned the underlying mathematical relationship between magnetic field perturbation and magnetic susceptibility. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons were performed between autoQSM and other two-step QSM methods. AutoQSM was able to recover magnetic susceptibility of anatomical structures near the edges of the brain including the veins covering the cortical surface, spinal cord and nerve tracts near the mouse brain boundaries. The advantages of high-quality maps, no need for brain volume extraction, and high reconstruction speed demonstrate autoQSM's potential for future applications.

[1]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Robust Brain Extraction Across Datasets and Comparison With Publicly Available Methods , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Yi Wang,et al.  Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map , 2012, NeuroImage.

[3]  Hongjiang Wei,et al.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Contrast Mechanisms and Clinical Applications , 2015, Tomography.

[4]  E. Haacke,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  J Tang,et al.  Improving susceptibility mapping using a threshold‐based K‐space/image domain iterative reconstruction approach , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  G. Allan Johnson,et al.  Prenatal alcohol exposure reduces magnetic susceptibility contrast and anisotropy in the white matter of mouse brains , 2014, NeuroImage.

[7]  Jiwon Oh,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility contrast variations in multiple sclerosis lesions , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Jianrong Xu,et al.  Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range , 2015, NMR in biomedicine.

[9]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Toward online reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility maps: Superfast dipole inversion , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Chunlei Liu,et al.  Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Wei Li,et al.  Susceptibility‐weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Hongfu Sun,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping using a superposed dipole inversion method: Application to intracranial hemorrhage , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Yimei Zhu,et al.  Fast phase unwrapping algorithm for interferometric applications. , 2003, Optics letters.

[15]  G. Bruce Pike,et al.  Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method , 2018, NeuroImage.

[16]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Wei Cao,et al.  A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2015, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Buch,et al.  Susceptibility mapping of the dural sinuses and other superficial veins in the brain. , 2019, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  A H Wilman,et al.  Structural and functional quantitative susceptibility mapping from standard fMRI studies , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[20]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: An approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  Jonas Adler,et al.  Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[22]  Richard Bowtell,et al.  Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: A comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods , 2010, NeuroImage.

[23]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[24]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Computing Large Deformation Metric Mappings via Geodesic Flows of Diffeomorphisms , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  A. Wilman,et al.  Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Yi Wang,et al.  Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single‐angle acquisition: Comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Bing Wu,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[29]  Xu Li,et al.  Mean magnetic susceptibility regularized susceptibility tensor imaging (MMSR‐STI) for estimating orientations of white matter fibers in human brain , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Chunlei Liu,et al.  Longitudinal atlas for normative human brain development and aging over the lifespan using quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2018, NeuroImage.

[31]  Shonit Punwani,et al.  The effect of low resolution and coverage on the accuracy of susceptibility mapping , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  G Allan Johnson,et al.  Susceptibility tensor imaging of the kidney and its microstructural underpinnings , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2011, NeuroImage.

[34]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning , 2017, Nature.

[35]  Julio Acosta-Cabronero,et al.  In Vivo MRI Mapping of Brain Iron Deposition across the Adult Lifespan , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Christian Langkammer,et al.  DeepQSM - using deep learning to solve the dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2019, NeuroImage.

[37]  Xue Xiao,et al.  Integrated Laplacian‐based phase unwrapping and background phase removal for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2014, NMR in biomedicine.

[38]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Automated graph-based analysis and correction of cortical volume topology , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Deep learning with domain adaptation for accelerated projection‐reconstruction MR , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[41]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[42]  Xu Li,et al.  Mapping magnetic susceptibility anisotropies of white matter in vivo in the human brain at 7T , 2012, NeuroImage.

[43]  Kawin Setsompop,et al.  Single‐step quantitative susceptibility mapping with variational penalties , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[44]  Yi Wang,et al.  Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  Angela Jakary,et al.  Ultrashort echo time and zero echo time MRI at 7T , 2016, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[46]  Antje Bischof,et al.  MRI gradient-echo phase contrast of the brain at ultra-short TE with off-resonance saturation , 2018, NeuroImage.

[47]  Kawin Setsompop,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet , 2018, NeuroImage.

[48]  Chunlei Liu Susceptibility tensor imaging , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[49]  Yi Wang,et al.  Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): A method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[50]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold‐based k‐space division , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[51]  Yi Wang,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[52]  Yi Wang,et al.  A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF) , 2011, NMR in biomedicine.

[53]  Wei Li,et al.  3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[54]  Hongjiang Wei,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy outside the central nervous system , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[55]  Yuyao Zhang,et al.  Joint 2D and 3D phase processing for quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to 2D echo‐planar imaging , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[56]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  Fast, automated, N‐dimensional phase‐unwrapping algorithm , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[57]  Yi Qi,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of myocardium imaged by cardiovascular magnetic resonance reflects the anisotropy of myocardial filament α-helix polypeptide bonds , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[58]  Wei Li,et al.  Susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) of the brain , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[59]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[60]  J. Duyn,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[61]  Andrew P. Leynes,et al.  Zero-Echo-Time and Dixon Deep Pseudo-CT (ZeDD CT): Direct Generation of Pseudo-CT Images for Pelvic PET/MRI Attenuation Correction Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks with Multiparametric MRI , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[62]  Steffen Bollmann,et al.  DeepQSM - Using Deep Learning to Solve the Dipole Inversion for MRI Susceptibility Mapping , 2018, bioRxiv.

[63]  Masao Fukushima,et al.  Some Reformulations and Applications of the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 1994 .

[64]  Li Guo,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Report from the 2016 reconstruction challenge , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[65]  Kristian Bredies,et al.  Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping using 3D EPI and total generalized variation , 2015, NeuroImage.