Local and global features of genetic networks supporting a phenotypic switch

Phenotypic switches are associated with alterations in the cell’s gene expression profile and are vital to many aspects of biology. Previous studies have identified local motifs of the genetic regulatory network that could underlie such switches. Recent advancements allowed the study of networks at the global, many-gene, level; however, the relationship between the local and global scales in giving rise to phenotypic switches remains elusive. In this work, we studied the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) using a gene regulatory network model. This model supports two clusters of stable steady-states identified with the epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes, and a range of intermediate less stable hybrid states, whose importance in cancer has been recently highlighted. Using an array of network perturbations and quantifying the resulting landscape, we investigated how features of the network at different levels give rise to these landscape properties. We found that local connectivity patterns affect the landscape in a mostly incremental manner; in particular, a specific previously identified double-negative feedback motif is not required when embedded in the full network, because the landscape is maintained at a global level. Nevertheless, despite the distributed nature of the switch, it is possible to find combinations of a few local changes that disrupt it. At the level of network architecture, we identified a crucial role for peripheral genes that act as incoming signals to the network in creating clusters of states. Such incoming signals are a signature of modularity and are expected to appear also in other biological networks. Hybrid states between epithelial and mesenchymal arise in the model due to barriers in the interaction between genes, causing hysteresis at all connections. Our results suggest emergent switches can neither be pinpointed to local motifs, nor do they arise as typical properties of random network ensembles. Rather, they arise through an interplay between the nature of local interactions, and the core-periphery structure induced by the modularity of the cell.

[1]  M. F. Shannon,et al.  An autocrine TGF-β/ZEB/miR-200 signaling network regulates establishment and maintenance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition , 2011, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  R. Weinberg,et al.  New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer , 2018, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  C. Meisinger,et al.  ZEB1 turns into a transcriptional activator by interacting with YAP1 in aggressive cancer types , 2016, Nature Communications.

[4]  Mohit Kumar Jolly,et al.  Computational systems biology of epithelial-hybrid-mesenchymal transitions , 2017 .

[5]  Shubham Tripathi,et al.  Biological Regulatory Networks are Minimally Frustrated , 2019 .

[6]  R. Thomas,et al.  Boolean formalization of genetic control circuits. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Varda Rotter,et al.  Coupling transcriptional and post-transcriptional miRNA regulation in the control of cell fate , 2009, Aging.

[8]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  Mathematical Modelling of Molecular Pathways Enabling Tumour Cell Invasion and Migration , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  A. García de Herreros,et al.  Cooperation, amplification, and feed-back in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[10]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  MicroRNA-based regulation of epithelial–hybrid–mesenchymal fate determination , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[12]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity: A Central Regulator of Cancer Progression. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[13]  Eline Boghaert,et al.  Regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Transmission of Mechanical Stress through Epithelial Tissues , 2012, Cancer Microenvironment.

[14]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Deciphering the Dynamics of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Cancer Stem Cells in Tumor Progression , 2018, Current Stem Cell Reports.

[15]  T. Brabletz,et al.  A reciprocal repression between ZEB1 and members of the miR-200 family promotes EMT and invasion in cancer cells , 2008, EMBO reports.

[16]  J. Mertz,et al.  Complete reversal of epithelial to mesenchymal transition requires inhibition of both ZEB expression and the Rho pathway , 2009, BMC Cell Biology.

[17]  Jason T. George,et al.  Interconnected feedback loops among ESRP1, HAS2, and CD44 regulate epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer , 2018, bioRxiv.

[18]  L. Glass,et al.  The logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Random Boolean network models and the yeast transcriptional network , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  S. Zapperi,et al.  Topography of epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  D. Pe’er,et al.  Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[22]  Satoru Miyano,et al.  Identification of Genetic Networks from a Small Number of Gene Expression Patterns Under the Boolean Network Model , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[23]  U. Alon Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  Assieh Saadatpour,et al.  Boolean modeling of biological regulatory networks: a methodology tutorial. , 2013, Methods.

[25]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[26]  William A. Flavahan,et al.  Epigenetic plasticity and the hallmarks of cancer , 2017, Science.

[27]  R. Albert,et al.  Towards control of cellular decision-making networks in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition , 2018, Physical biology.

[28]  M. F. Shannon,et al.  A double-negative feedback loop between ZEB1-SIP1 and the microRNA-200 family regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition. , 2008, Cancer research.

[29]  H. Levine,et al.  Epigenetic feedback and stochastic partitioning during cell division can drive resistance to EMT , 2020, bioRxiv.

[30]  T. Fleming,et al.  A double-negative feedback loop between EpCAM and ERK contributes to the regulation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition in cancer , 2017, Oncogene.

[31]  Kakajan Komurov,et al.  Core epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition interactome gene-expression signature is associated with claudin-low and metaplastic breast cancer subtypes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Simone Brabletz,et al.  The ZEB/miR‐200 feedback loop—a motor of cellular plasticity in development and cancer? , 2010, EMBO reports.

[33]  M. Korpal,et al.  The miR-200 Family Inhibits Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Cancer Cell Migration by Direct Targeting of E-cadherin Transcriptional Repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Reka Albert,et al.  Combinatorial interventions inhibit TGFβ-driven epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and support hybrid cellular phenotypes , 2015, npj Systems Biology and Applications.

[35]  Atsushi Mochizuki,et al.  Expected Number of Fixed Points in Boolean Networks with Arbitrary Topology. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[36]  P. Visscher,et al.  Common Disease Is More Complex Than Implied by the Core Gene Omnigenic Model , 2018, Cell.

[37]  S. Kauffman,et al.  On the dynamics of random Boolean networks subject to noise: attractors, ergodic sets and cell types. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Boolean network models of cellular regulation: prospects and limitations , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  Jianhua Xing,et al.  Coupled reversible and irreversible bistable switches underlying TGFβ-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[40]  Reka Albert,et al.  Network modeling of TGFβ signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition reveals joint sonic hedgehog and Wnt pathway activation. , 2014, Cancer research.

[41]  N. Beerenwinkel,et al.  A Hierarchical Regulatory Landscape during the Multiple Stages of EMT. , 2019, Developmental cell.

[42]  E. Ben-Jacob,et al.  Stability of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype , 2016, Oncotarget.

[43]  Yitzhak Pilpel,et al.  Global and Local Architecture of the Mammalian microRNA–Transcription Factor Regulatory Network , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  Balaram Vishnu Subramani,et al.  Identifying inhibitors of epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity using a network topology-based approach , 2019, bioRxiv.

[45]  Jingyu Zhang,et al.  TGF-β–induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition proceeds through stepwise activation of multiple feedback loops , 2014, Science Signaling.

[46]  Ellen T. Gelfand,et al.  A Novel Approach to High-Quality Postmortem Tissue Procurement: The GTEx Project , 2015, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[47]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  Hysteresis control of epithelial-mesenchymal transition dynamics conveys a distinct program with enhanced metastatic ability , 2018, Nature Communications.