Operating region comparison of symmetric and asymmetric Multilevel Shunt Active Power Filters

An operating region comparison is performed between a symmetric and an asymmetric CHB Multilevel Shunt Active Power Filter aimed to simultaneously compensate linear and nonlinear currents. The symmetric approach considers that all the power cells injects the same voltage; while the asymmetric case consists in the inclusion of two types of power cells; one of them meant for fundamental reactive power compensation and the other to cancel out the distortion power. Using steady state equations, the modulating signals of the H-bridges are calculated for a wide range of load conditions. This is used to identify when the converters lie in over-modulation and thus, the allowable operating region is found. Different values for the system parameters are considered in order to identify the compensation capabilities of both approaches. The presented results are supported with theoretical developments and simulated analyses.

[1]  J. Espinoza,et al.  Asymmetric multilevel STATCOM to compensate reactive power and current harmonics , 2012, IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[2]  Ebrahim Babaei,et al.  A new strategy to control three-phase shunt active filters under balanced and unbalanced conditions by controlling one phase current , 2013, 4th Annual International Power Electronics, Drive Systems and Technologies Conference.

[3]  Vinod Khadkikar,et al.  Artificial-Neural-Network-Based Phase-Locking Scheme for Active Power Filters , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  José R. Espinoza,et al.  Decoupled and Modular Harmonic Compensation for Multilevel STATCOMs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[5]  M. Sumner,et al.  Low Carrier–Fundamental Frequency Ratio PWM for Multilevel Active Shunt Power Filters for Aerospace Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[6]  Marcelo Lobo Heldwein,et al.  Active Power Filter Control Strategy With Implicit Closed-Loop Current Control and Resonant Controller , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  Juan Dixon,et al.  Cascaded Multilevel Converters: Optimal Asymmetries and Floating Capacitor Control , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Jinjun Liu,et al.  Hybrid Cascaded H-bridge Converter for Harmonic Current Compensation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[9]  Jaime Rohten,et al.  Switching losses analysis of an asymmetric multilevel Shunt Active Power Filter , 2013, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[10]  Marta Molinas,et al.  A Transformerless Series Reactive/Harmonic Compensator for Line-Commutated HVDC for Grid Integration of Offshore Wind Power , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  S.J. Finney,et al.  Three-Phase, Three-Wire, Five-Level Cascaded Shunt Active Filter for Power Conditioning, Using Two Different Space Vector Modulation Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[12]  Subramanyam,et al.  The Alternate Arm Converter: A New Hybrid Multilevel Converter with DC-Fault Blocking Capability , 2016 .

[13]  Ritwik Majumder,et al.  Reactive Power Compensation in Single-Phase Operation of Microgrid , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Mariusz Malinowski,et al.  A Survey on Cascaded Multilevel Inverters , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  J. Espinoza,et al.  A comprehensive control strategy for an asymmetric multilevel Shunt Active Power Filter , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).