Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast

We studied the rules by which visual responses to luminous targets are combined across the two eyes. Previous work has found very different forms of binocular combination for targets defined by increments and by decrements of luminance, with decrement data implying a severe nonlinearity before binocular combination. We ask whether this difference is due to the luminance of the target, the luminance of the background, or the sign of the luminance excursion. We estimated the pre-binocular nonlinearity (power exponent) by fitting a computational model to ocular equibrightness matches. The severity of the nonlinearity had a monotonic dependence on the signed difference between target and background luminance. For dual targets, in which there was both a luminance increment and a luminance decrement (e.g. contrast), perception was governed largely by the decrement. The asymmetry in the nonlinearities derived from the subjective matching data made a clear prediction for visual performance: there should be more binocular summation for detecting luminance increments than for detecting luminance decrements. This prediction was confirmed by the results of a subsequent experiment. We discuss the relation between these results and luminance nonlinearities such as a logarithmic transform, as well as the involvement of contemporary model architectures of binocular vision.

[1]  S. Anstis,et al.  Nonlinear combination of luminance excursions during flicker, simultaneous contrast, afterimages and binocular fusion , 1998, Vision Research.

[2]  W. McIlhagga,et al.  Sinusoid=light bar+dark bar? , 2006, Vision Research.

[3]  G. Legge,et al.  Binocular interactions in suprathreshold contrast perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  D. Macleod,et al.  The Schrödinger Equation in Binocular Brightness Combination , 1972, Perception.

[5]  T S Meese,et al.  Using the standard staircase to measure the point of subjective equality: A guide based on computer simulations , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  K. Naka,et al.  S‐potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae) , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  George Sperling,et al.  A gain-control theory of binocular combination. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  P. Whittle,et al.  Contrast discrimination at high contrasts reveals the influence of local light adaptation on contrast processing , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  Engel Gr,et al.  Tests of a model of binocular brightness. , 1970 .

[10]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[11]  J. Gaddum Probit Analysis , 1948, Nature.

[12]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Binocular contrast summation—I. Detection and discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[14]  G. Fechner Über einige Verhältnisse des binocularen Sehens , 2022 .

[15]  T. Meese,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision , 2007, Neuroscience.

[16]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Binocular contrast summation—II. Quadratic summation , 1984, Vision Research.

[17]  G. R. Engel,et al.  The autocorrelation function and binocular brightness mixing. , 1969, Vision research.

[18]  G. R. Engel,et al.  Tests of a model of binocular brightness. , 1970, Canadian journal of psychology.

[19]  P. Whittle Brightness, discriminability and the “Crispening Effect” , 1992, Vision Research.

[20]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of binocular brightness perception , 1999, Vision Research.

[21]  W. Levelt,et al.  BINOCULAR BRIGHTNESS AVERAGING AND CONTOUR INFORMATION. , 1965, British journal of psychology.

[22]  C. D. Weert,et al.  Binocular brightness combinations: Additive and nonadditive aspects , 1974 .

[23]  D. W. Curtis,et al.  Fechner’s paradox reflects a nonmonotone relation between binocular brightness and luminance , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  S. R. Lehky A model of binocular brightness and binaural loudness perception in humans with general applications to nonlinear summation of sensory inputs , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Human binocular summation at absolute threshold. , 1974, Vision research.

[26]  E. Peli In search of a contrast metric: Matching the perceived contrast of gabor patches at different phases and bandwidths , 1997, Vision Research.

[27]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Detection and Discrimination , 1991 .

[28]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  An anchoring theory of lightness perception. , 1999 .

[29]  P. Whittle Increments and decrements: Luminance discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[30]  J. Anthony Movshon,et al.  Binocular combination of contrast signals , 1989, Vision Research.

[31]  T. Meese,et al.  Contrast summation across eyes and space is revealed along the entire dipper function by a "Swiss cheese" stimulus. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[32]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .