Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. El-Menyar | Rajvir Singh | J. Al Suwaidi | A. Salam | Amar M Salam | Rajvir Singh | W. Dabdoob | Ayman A El-Menyar | Jassim Al Suwaidi | H. Albinali | K M Das | Wafer Amin K Dabdoob | Hajar A Albinali | K. Das
[1] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[2] P. Serruys,et al. Clinical and Angiographic Factors Associated With Asymptomatic Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2001, Circulation.
[3] W Rutsch,et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trial. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] Filippo Cademartiri,et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[5] P. Serruys,et al. Angiographic Findings of the Multicenter Randomized Study With the Sirolimus-Eluting Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent (RAVEL): Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Inhibit Restenosis Irrespective of the Vessel Size , 2002, Circulation.
[6] P. Teirstein,et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.
[7] H. S. Mueller,et al. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.
[8] D. Fleischmann. Use of high concentration contrast media: principles and rationale-vascular district. , 2003, European journal of radiology.
[9] W. Heindel,et al. 64- Versus 16-Slice CT Angiography for Coronary Artery Stent Assessment: In Vitro Experience , 2006, Investigative radiology.
[10] Thomas Flohr,et al. Flat-panel Detector Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stents: Phantom Study in Comparison With 16-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2005, Investigative radiology.
[11] Rüdiger Blindt,et al. Coronary Artery Stents in Multislice Computed Tomography: In Vitro Artifact Evaluation , 2004, Investigative radiology.
[12] K. Bae,et al. Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.
[13] J. Blanc,et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography , 2005, Heart.
[14] T. Fujii,et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.
[15] Rainer Raupach,et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter , 2005, European Radiology.
[16] W. B. Meijboom,et al. Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[17] P. Serruys,et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.
[18] G. Stone,et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. , 1999, Circulation.
[19] Mary E. Russell,et al. TAXUS I: Six- and Twelve-Month Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on a Slow-Release Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for De Novo Coronary Lesions , 2003, Circulation.
[20] R. Virmani,et al. Pathology of acute and chronic coronary stenting in humans. , 1999, Circulation.
[21] I. Meredith,et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of ambiguous coronary lesions. , 2001, Heart, lung & circulation.