Changes in “Top-Down” Connectivity Underlie Repetition Suppression in the Ventral Visual Pathway

Repetition of the same stimulus leads to a reduction in neural activity known as repetition suppression (RS). In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), RS is found for multiple object categories. One proposal is that RS reflects locally based “within-region” changes, such as neural fatigue. Thus, if a given region shows RS across changes in stimulus size or view, then it is inferred to hold size- or view-invariant representations. An alternative hypothesis characterizes RS as a consequence of “top-down” between-region modulation. Differentiating between these accounts is central to the correct interpretation of fMRI RS data. It is also unknown whether the same mechanisms underlie RS to identical stimuli and RS across changes in stimulus size or view. Using fMRI, we investigated RS within a body-sensitive network in human visual cortex comprising the extrastriate body area (EBA) and the fusiform body area (FBA). Both regions showed RS to identical images of the same body that was unaffected by changes in body size or view. Dynamic causal modeling demonstrated that changes in backward, top-down (FBA-to-EBA) effective connectivity play a critical role in RS. Furthermore, only repetition of the identical image showed additional changes in forward connectivity (EBA-to-FBA). These results suggest that RS is driven by changes in top-down modulation, whereas the contribution of “feedforward” changes in connectivity is dependent on the precise nature of the repetition. Our results challenge previous interpretations regarding the underlying nature of neural representations made using fMRI RS paradigms.

[1]  T. Andrews,et al.  The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Peter U. Tse,et al.  Neural correlates of transformational apparent motion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Time Course of Processes and Representations Supporting Visual Object Identification and Memory , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Raftery Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[5]  Alex Martin,et al.  Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  M. Goodale,et al.  Abnormal face identity coding in the middle fusiform gyrus of two brain-damaged prosopagnosic patients , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  E. Miller,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal sensitivity in visual cortex and local feature discrimination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  Peter Ulric Tse,et al.  The duration of 3-D form analysis in transformational apparent motion , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[15]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human Body , 2001, Science.

[19]  P. Sah,et al.  Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels: Multiple Contributions to Neuronal Function , 2003, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[20]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Abnormal fMRI Adaptation to Unfamiliar Faces in a Case of Developmental Prosopamnesia , 2007, Current Biology.

[21]  R. Henson,et al.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. , 1999 .

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  R. Guillery,et al.  On the actions that one nerve cell can have on another: distinguishing "drivers" from "modulators". , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  P. Downing,et al.  The neural basis of visual body perception , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  R. Henson Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[30]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  fMRI-adaptation studies of viewpoint tuning in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Jim M. Monti,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[36]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  fMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[37]  Tomáš Paus,et al.  Neural Correlates of Human Body Perception , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Maija Pihlajamäki,et al.  Impaired medial temporal repetition suppression is related to failure of parietal deactivation in Alzheimer disease. , 2008, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.