Knowing a Word Affects the Fundamental Perception of The Sounds Within it

Understanding spoken language is an exceptional computational achievement of the human cognitive apparatus. Theories of how humans recognize spoken words fall into two categories: Some theories assume a fully bottom-up flow of information, in which successively more abstract representations are computed. Other theories, in contrast, assert that activation of a more abstract representation (e.g., a word) can affect the activation of smaller units (e.g., phonemes or syllables). The two experimental conditions reported here demonstrate the top-down influence of word representations on the activation of smaller perceptual units. The results show that perceptual processes are not strictly bottom-up: Computations at logically lower levels of processing are affected by computations at logically more abstract levels. These results constrain and inform theories of the architecture of human perceptual processing of speech.

[1]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review , 1984 .

[2]  W Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.

[3]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Similarity Mapping in Spoken Word Recognition , 1997 .

[4]  D. Massaro Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches , 1999 .

[6]  A G Samuel,et al.  An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  J. Lederberg,et al.  Size Adaptation : A New Aftereffect , 1969 .

[8]  Arthur G. Samuel,et al.  Early levels of analysis of speech. , 1996 .

[9]  A. Samuel Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Margaret F. Cheesman,et al.  Selective adaptation by context‐conditioned fricatives , 1995 .

[12]  R. M. Warren Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[13]  C M Connine,et al.  Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Marc Green Orientation-Specific Adaptation: Effects of Checkerboards on the Detectability of Gratings , 1980, Perception.

[15]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors , 1973 .

[16]  A. Samuel Lexical Activation Produces Potent Phonemic Percepts , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[18]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Auditory and phonetic processes in place perception for stops , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds , 1976, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Peripheral and central processes in selective adaptation of place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  A. Samuel Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes , 1996 .

[24]  James R. Sawusch,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – Auditory and Phonetic Coding of Speech* , 1986 .

[25]  D. Norris Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[26]  J. M. Ackroff,et al.  Auditory Induction: Perceptual Synthesis of Absent Sounds , 1972, Science.

[27]  A. Samuel Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat's visual cortex. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.