Off-Line Learning and the Primary Motor Cortex

We are all familiar with acquiring skills during practice, but skill can also continue to develop between practice sessions. These “off-line” improvements are frequently supported by sleep, but they can be time dependent when a skill is acquired unintentionally. The magnitude of these over-day and overnight improvements is similar, suggesting that a similar mechanism may support both types of off-line improvements. However, here we show that disruption of the primary motor cortex with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation blocks off-line improvements over the day but not overnight. This suggests that a memory may be rescued overnight and subsequently enhanced or that different aspects of a skill, with differential dependencies on the primary motor cortex, are enhanced over day and overnight. Off-line improvements of similar magnitude are not supported by similar mechanisms; instead, the mechanisms engaged may depend on brain state.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  S. Boniface,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Locating the Motor Cortex on the MRI with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and PET , 1996, NeuroImage.

[6]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low‐frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neurology.

[8]  T. Paus.  Imaging the brain before, during, and after transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Kastner,et al.  High‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation delays rapid eye movement sleep , 1998, Neuroreport.

[11]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  The Relation Between Implicit and Explicit Learning: Evidence for Parallel Development , 1999 .

[13]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Experience-dependent changes in cerebral activation during human REM sleep , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Paolo Manganotti,et al.  Decrease in motor cortical excitability in human subjects after sleep deprivation , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  P. Achermann,et al.  High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left dorsolateral cortex: EEG topography during waking and subsequent sleep , 2001, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[17]  M. Hallett,et al.  Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis. , 2002, Learning & memory.

[19]  J. Hobson,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of sleep: neuronal systems, consciousness and learning , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Ashe,et al.  Cerebellum Activation Associated with Performance Change but Not Motor Learning , 2002, Science.

[21]  Nick J. Davey,et al.  Stability of corticospinal excitability and grip force in intrinsic hand muscles in man over a 24-h period , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[22]  A. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Consolidation during sleep of perceptual learning of spoken language , 2003, Nature.

[24]  E. Wassermann,et al.  Priming Stimulation Enhances the Depressant Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Passingham,et al.  Sleep-Related Consolidation of a Visuomotor Skill: Brain Mechanisms as Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Patients with focal arm dystonia have increased sensitivity to slow-frequency repetitive TMS of the dorsal premotor cortex. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Consolidation of Dynamic Motor Learning Is Not Disrupted by rTMS of Primary Motor Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[28]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Awareness Modifies the Skill-Learning Benefits of Sleep , 2004, Current Biology.

[29]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Current concepts in procedural consolidation , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  David L Wright,et al.  Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task , 2004, Psychological research.

[31]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  The time course of off-line motor sequence learning. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  Matthew P Walker,et al.  A refined model of sleep and the time course of memory formation. , 2005, The Behavioral and brain sciences.