Co–option of male courtship signals from aggressive display in bowerbirds

The pre–existing trait hypothesis suggests that females evolve a mating preference for an already existing male trait. This hypothesis poses a simple resolution to Darwin's long–standing question of how elaborate, male display traits evolve. The frequently observed convergence of aggressive and courtship displays across a wide array of species provides the only current support for this hypothesis. Here we provide much more detailed supporting evidence from bowerbird skrraa calls used in aggression and courtship. Consistent with the pre–existing trait hypothesis we show that (i) putatively co–opted skrraa calls used in courtship and aggression are homologous, (ii) skrraa calls were used in aggression in bowerbirds before being used in courtship, (iii) historically, intense, aggressive–like courtship calls were present near the time of co-option, and (iv) bower types contemporaneous with co–option emphasize design features that provide females protection from the adverse effects of intense courtship displays. These results, plus evidence for a female preference for males with intense aggressive–like courtship skrraa calls, suggest that aggressive skrraa calls have been co–opted for use in male courtship display.

[1]  Dennis Hasselquist,et al.  Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler , 1996, Nature.

[2]  M. Turelli Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. , 1984, Theoretical population biology.

[3]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[4]  A. Basolo Phylogenetic evidence for the role of a pre-existing bias in sexual selection , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  K. Johnson The evolution of bill coloration and plumage dimorphism supports the transference hypothesis in dabbling ducks , 1999 .

[6]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.

[7]  G. Borgia Threat Reduction as a Cause of Differences in Bower Architecture, Bower Decoration and Male Display in Two Closely-Related Bowerbirds Chlamydera nuchalis and C. maculata , 1995 .

[8]  G. Borgia,et al.  Coevolution of elaborated male display traits in the spotted bowerbird: an experimental test of the threat reduction hypothesis , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  W. Beebe Pheasants : their lives and homes , 1926 .

[10]  G. Borgia,et al.  Feather stealing in the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): male competition and the quality of display , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  M. Ryan Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. , 1998, Science.

[12]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[13]  J. Carranza,et al.  Effects of male dominance and courtship display on female choice in the ring-necked pheasant , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  G. Borgia,et al.  Parasites and Bright Male Plumage in the Satin Bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) , 1990 .

[15]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility , 1996 .

[16]  R. Crozier,et al.  Labile evolution of display traits in bowerbirds indicates reduced effects of phylogenetic constraint , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  M. Petrie,et al.  Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains , 1994, Nature.

[18]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[19]  D. Schluter,et al.  LIKELIHOOD OF ANCESTOR STATES IN ADAPTIVE RADIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  Andrew P. Martin Increasing Genomic Complexity by Gene Duplication and the Origin of Vertebrates , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[21]  E. M. Kemp,et al.  Late Cainozoic environments in Australia , 1981 .

[22]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.

[23]  R. Nichols,et al.  Sexual preference and genetic correlations. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  N. Burley Sexual Selection for Aesthetic Traits in Species with Biparental Care , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[25]  G. Wilkinson,et al.  Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression , 1998, Nature.

[26]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  G. Borgia SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF MATING SYSTEMS , 1979 .

[28]  A. Pomiankowski,et al.  The genetic basis of female mate preferences , 1995 .

[29]  R. Nichols,et al.  Does runaway sexual selection work in finite populations? , 1989 .

[30]  R. Butlin,et al.  Female choice and genetic correlations. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  G. Borgia,et al.  Sexual Selection, Mating Systems, and the Evolution of Avian Acoustical Displays , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[32]  E. Morton On the Occurrence and Significance of Motivation-Structural Rules in Some Bird and Mammal Sounds , 1977, The American Naturalist.