Co–option of male courtship signals from aggressive display in bowerbirds
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dennis Hasselquist,et al. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler , 1996, Nature.
[2] M. Turelli. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. , 1984, Theoretical population biology.
[3] R. Meldola. Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.
[4] A. Basolo. Phylogenetic evidence for the role of a pre-existing bias in sexual selection , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[5] K. Johnson. The evolution of bill coloration and plumage dimorphism supports the transference hypothesis in dabbling ducks , 1999 .
[6] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.
[7] G. Borgia. Threat Reduction as a Cause of Differences in Bower Architecture, Bower Decoration and Male Display in Two Closely-Related Bowerbirds Chlamydera nuchalis and C. maculata , 1995 .
[8] G. Borgia,et al. Coevolution of elaborated male display traits in the spotted bowerbird: an experimental test of the threat reduction hypothesis , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[9] W. Beebe. Pheasants : their lives and homes , 1926 .
[10] G. Borgia,et al. Feather stealing in the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): male competition and the quality of display , 1986, Animal Behaviour.
[11] M. Ryan. Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. , 1998, Science.
[12] R. Trivers. Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .
[13] J. Carranza,et al. Effects of male dominance and courtship display on female choice in the ring-necked pheasant , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[14] G. Borgia,et al. Parasites and Bright Male Plumage in the Satin Bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) , 1990 .
[15] A. Pilastro,et al. Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility , 1996 .
[16] R. Crozier,et al. Labile evolution of display traits in bowerbirds indicates reduced effects of phylogenetic constraint , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[17] M. Petrie,et al. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains , 1994, Nature.
[18] Theodore Garland,et al. Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .
[19] D. Schluter,et al. LIKELIHOOD OF ANCESTOR STATES IN ADAPTIVE RADIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[20] Andrew P. Martin. Increasing Genomic Complexity by Gene Duplication and the Origin of Vertebrates , 1999, The American Naturalist.
[21] E. M. Kemp,et al. Late Cainozoic environments in Australia , 1981 .
[22] M. Ryan,et al. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.
[23] R. Nichols,et al. Sexual preference and genetic correlations. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[24] N. Burley. Sexual Selection for Aesthetic Traits in Species with Biparental Care , 1986, The American Naturalist.
[25] G. Wilkinson,et al. Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression , 1998, Nature.
[26] W. Hamilton. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.
[27] G. Borgia. SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF MATING SYSTEMS , 1979 .
[28] A. Pomiankowski,et al. The genetic basis of female mate preferences , 1995 .
[29] R. Nichols,et al. Does runaway sexual selection work in finite populations? , 1989 .
[30] R. Butlin,et al. Female choice and genetic correlations. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[31] G. Borgia,et al. Sexual Selection, Mating Systems, and the Evolution of Avian Acoustical Displays , 1986, The American Naturalist.
[32] E. Morton. On the Occurrence and Significance of Motivation-Structural Rules in Some Bird and Mammal Sounds , 1977, The American Naturalist.