Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information

This paper discusses multiple criteria models of decision analysis with finite sets of alternatives. A weighted sum of criteria is used to evaluate the performance of alternatives. Information about the weights is assumed to be in the form of arbitrary linear constraints. Conditions for checking dominance and potential optimality of decision alternatives are presented. In the case of testing potential optimality, the proposed appoach leads to the consideration of a couple of mutually dual linear programming problems. The analysis of these problems gives valuable information for the decision maker. In particular, if a decision alternative is not potentially optimal, then a mixed alternative dominating it is defined by a solution to one of the LP problems. This statement generalizes similar results known for some special cases. The interpretation of the mixed alternative is discussed and compared to its analogue in a data envelopment analysis context.

[1]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application , 1985, Oper. Res..

[2]  A. Athanassopoulos.  Goal programming & data envelopment analysis (GoDEA) for target-based multi-level planning: Allocating central grants to the Greek local authorities , 1995 .

[3]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Decision theory and strict ranking of probabilities , 1982 .

[4]  Simon French,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN DISCRETE MULTI OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING , 1991 .

[5]  Martin Weber.  Decision Making with Incomplete Information , 1987 .

[6]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Obtaining Nondominated Priority Vectors for Multiple Objective Decisionmaking Problems with Different Combinations of Cardinal and Ordinal Information , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Simon French,et al.  Uncertainty and Imprecision: Modelling and Analysis , 1995 .

[8]  James Corner,et al.  Characteristics of Decisions in Decision Analysis Practice , 1995 .

[9]  Theodor J. Stewart.  Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making: A response , 1994 .

[10]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Decision And Value Theory , 1965 .

[11]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making , 1993 .

[12]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Estimating preferred target input−output levels using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[13]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[14]  W. Cook,et al.  A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data , 1991 .

[15]  Chelsea C. White,et al.  A penalty function approach to alternative pairwise comparisons in ISMAUT , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[16]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Relationships between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1996 .

[17]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[18]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Demystifying DEA — A Visual Interactive Approach Based on Multiple Criteria Analysis , 1993 .

[19]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Multiple criteria decision support - A review , 1992 .

[20]  Vadim P. Berman,et al.  Interval Value Tradeoffs Methodology and Techniques of Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1993 .

[21]  Karl Mosler,et al.  An interactive decision procedure with multiple attributes under risk , 1994, Ann. Oper. Res..

[22]  J. Storbeck,et al.  Non-parametric models for spatial efficiency , 1995 .

[23]  P. Fishburn.  Analysis of Decisions with Incomplete Knowledge of Probabilities , 1965 .

[24]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Partial Information, Dominance, and Potential Optimality in Multiattribute Utility Theory , 1986, Oper. Res..

[25]  F. Fernández,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis with partial information about the weighting coefficients , 1995 .