Pronouns in Marital Interaction

Recent studies in social psychology have found that the frequency of certain words in people's speech and writing is related to psychological aspects of their personal health. We investigated whether counts of “self” and “other” pronouns used by 59 couples engaged in a problem-solving discussion were related to indices of marital health. One spouse in each couple had a diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder or panic disorder with agoraphobia; 50% of the patients and 40% of their spouses reported marital dissatisfaction. Regardless of patients' diagnostic status, spouses who used more second-person pronouns were more negative during interactions, whereas those who used more first-person plural pronouns produced more positive problem solutions, even when negative behavior was statistically controlled. Moreover, use of first-person singular pronouns was positively associated with marital satisfaction. These findings suggest that pronouns used by spouses during conflict-resolution discussions provide insight into the quality of their interactions and marriages.

[1]  G. Spanier Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads , 1976 .

[2]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  John M. Gottman,et al.  How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. , 1992 .

[4]  Steven R. Brown,et al.  Verbal Behavior: Adaptation and Psychopathology , 1982 .

[5]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Markers of Psychological Change Surrounding September 11, 2001 , 2004, Psychological science.

[6]  D. Chambless,et al.  Expressed emotion and behavior therapy outcome: a prospective study with obsessive-compulsive and agoraphobic outpatients. , 1999, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[7]  Alan L. Sillars,et al.  Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations , 1997 .

[8]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Secret Life of Pronouns , 2003, Psychological science.

[9]  A. B. Hollingshead Four Factor Index of Social Status [1975] , 1975 .

[10]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies , 1976 .

[11]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. , 1998 .

[12]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Trauma in Real Time: Talking and Avoiding Online Conversations About the Death of Princess Diana , 2002 .

[13]  J. Gottman,et al.  What predicts change in marital interaction over time? A study of alternative models. , 1999, Family process.

[14]  W. Bucci,et al.  Linking verbal and non-verbal representations: computer analysis of referential activity. , 1999, The British journal of medical psychology.

[15]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[17]  William Ickes,et al.  Machiavellianism and Self-Monitoring: As Different as “Me” and “You” , 1986 .

[18]  Cognitive interdependece: Commitment and the cognitive representation of close relationships. , 1998 .

[19]  J. Sinacore Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .