Semi-analytical solutions for seismic responses of tunnel tube in pier-supported submerged floating tunnel under vertical excitation

ABSTRACT The concept of pier-supported submerged floating tunnel (PSFT) is feasible if the water depth is within 100 m. In this study, semi-analytical solutions are proposed for determining the seismic responses of a tunnel tube in a PSFT subjected to vertical excitation. The tunnel tube consisting of tube segments and flexible joints is simplified as beam components connected through bending springs. The supporting system comprising bearings and piers is regarded as a series of discrete Kelvin elements. Seismic action is considered as the inertia force and hydrodynamic pressure is calculated by the Morison equation. The tunnel tube displacement is derived by the modal superposition method. On this basis, the semi-analytical solutions of the displacement and bending moment of the tunnel tube are deduced using the Runge–Kutta method. The finite element method is employed to examine the validity of the proposed solutions. Furthermore, the effects of the fluid, flexible joints, and damping ratio are discussed. The results show that the Froude–Klylov force can significantly reduce the response amplitude, and the hydrodynamic mass force can alter the response frequency under real seismic input motion. Flexible joints can adjust the bending moment distribution in the tunnel tube. With the adoption of flexible joints, the hogging moments at the bearings considerably decrease. The change in damping ratio also have substantial effects on the structural seismic response.

[1]  Yong Yuan,et al.  Analytical solutions for seismic responses of the tunnel in a shaft-tunnel junction under transverse excitations , 2019 .

[2]  Y. Xiang,et al.  Effects of marine sediment on the response of a submerged floating tunnel to P-wave incidence , 2019, Acta Mechanica Sinica.

[3]  Y. Xiang,et al.  Effects of marine sediment on the response of a submerged floating tunnel to P-wave incidence , 2019, Acta Mechanica Sinica.

[4]  Moo-Hyun Kim,et al.  Time-Domain Hydro-Elastic Analysis of a SFT (Submerged Floating Tunnel) with Mooring Lines under Extreme Wave and Seismic Excitations , 2018, Applied Sciences.

[5]  Y. Xiang,et al.  Dynamic response analysis for submerged floating tunnel due to fluid-vehicle-tunnel interaction , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[6]  Haitao Yu,et al.  Analytical solution for a finite Euler–Bernoulli beam with single discontinuity in section under arbitrary dynamic loads , 2018, Applied Mathematical Modelling.

[7]  T. Arthi,et al.  Submerged Floating Tunnels , 2018 .

[8]  G. Mei,et al.  Vibration response of cable for submerged floating tunnel under simultaneous hydrodynamic force and earthquake excitations , 2018 .

[9]  Zahid Ullah,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Submerged Floating Tunnel Subjected to Hydrodynamic and Seismic Excitations , 2017 .

[10]  S. Tariverdilo,et al.  Seismic response of submerged floating tunnel under support excitation , 2017 .

[11]  S. Seo,et al.  Seismic behaviors of a floating submerged tunnel with a rectangular cross-section , 2016 .

[12]  Sung-Il Seo,et al.  Simplified analysis for estimation of the behavior of a submerged floating tunnel in waves and experimental verification , 2015 .

[13]  Youshi Hong,et al.  Feasibility study on buoyancy–weight ratios of a submerged floating tunnel prototype subjected to hydrodynamic loads , 2015 .

[14]  Xiang Yi-qiang,et al.  Vortex-Induced Dynamic Response Analysis for the Submerged Floating Tunnel System under the Effect of Currents , 2013 .

[15]  Luca Martinelli,et al.  On the Generation of Seaquake Velocity Fields for Submerged Floating Tunnel Structures , 2013 .

[16]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  On the slack phenomena and snap force in tethers of submerged floating tunnels under wave conditions , 2011 .

[17]  Luca Martinelli,et al.  A numerical procedure for simulating the multi-support seismic response of submerged floating tunnels anchored by cables , 2011 .

[18]  Federico Perotti,et al.  Numerical models for the dynamic response of submerged floating tunnels under seismic loading , 2008 .

[19]  Ben C. Gerwick,et al.  Construction of Marine and Offshore Structures , 2007 .

[20]  F. Perotti,et al.  The dynamic response of seabed anchored floating tunnels under seismic excitation , 2000 .

[21]  Lars Christian F. Ingerslev,et al.  Water crossings — the options , 1998 .

[22]  Donna Ahrens,et al.  Chapter 10 submerged floating tunnels—a a concept whose time has arrived , 1997 .

[23]  A Gursoy,et al.  IMMERSED AND FLOATING TUNNELS, SECOND EDITION. CHAPTER 10: SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNELS - A CONCEPT WHOSE TIME HAS ARRIVED , 1997 .

[24]  Arnaud Deraemaeker Dynamics of structures , 1990 .

[25]  Luca Martinelli,et al.  Submerged Floating Tunnels under Seismic Motion: Vibration Mitigation and Seaquake effects☆ , 2016 .

[26]  Håvard Østlid,et al.  When is SFT competitive , 2010 .

[27]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Seismic analysis of a SFT solution for the Messina Strait crossing , 2010 .

[28]  Guojun Huang,et al.  Seismic wave passage effect on dynamic response of submerged floating tunnels , 2010 .

[29]  Luca Martinelli,et al.  Modeling of Qiandao Lake submerged floating tunnel subject to multi-support seismic input , 2010 .

[30]  Jian Xiao,et al.  Transverse earthquake response and design analysis of submerged floating tunnels with various shore connections , 2010 .

[31]  B. Sumer,et al.  Hydrodynamics around cylindrical structures , 2006 .

[32]  Aurelio Muttoni,et al.  The Lake Lugano Crossing-Technical Solutions , 2001 .

[33]  Per Tveit,et al.  Ideas on downward arched and other underwater concrete tunnels , 2000 .

[34]  Yuzo Mizuno,et al.  Earthquake response analysis of submerged floating tunnels considering water compressibility , 1994 .

[35]  F. Brancaleoni,et al.  THE RESPONSE OF SUBMERGED TUNNELS TO THEIR ENVIRONMENT , 1989 .