The GMOS cyber(e)-infrastructure: advanced services for supporting science and policy

The need for coordinated, systematized and catalogued databases on mercury in the environment is of paramount importance as improved information can help the assessment of the effectiveness of measures established to phase out and ban mercury. Long-term monitoring sites have been established in a number of regions and countries for the measurement of mercury in ambient air and wet deposition. Long term measurements of mercury concentration in biota also produced a huge amount of information, but such initiatives are far from being within a global, systematic and interoperable approach. To address these weaknesses the on-going Global Mercury Observation System (GMOS) project (www.gmos.eu) established a coordinated global observation system for mercury as well it retrieved historical data (www.gmos.eu/sdi). To manage such large amount of information a technological infrastructure was planned. This high-performance back-end resource associated with sophisticated client applications enables data storage, computing services, telecommunications networks and all services necessary to support the activity. This paper reports the architecture definition of the GMOS Cyber(e)-Infrastructure and the services developed to support science and policy, including the United Nation Environmental Program. It finally describes new possibilities in data analysis and data management through client applications.

[1]  N. Pirrone,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of atmospheric mercury species over the Adriatic Sea , 2008 .

[2]  Thomas Kudrass.  Describing Architectures Using RM-ODP , 2003 .

[3]  F. Slemr,et al.  Increase in global atmospheric concentrations of mercury inferred from measurements over the Atlantic Ocean , 1992, Nature.

[4]  Brad Novotny.  ICT infrastructures for e-science , 2014 .

[5]  Xinbin Feng,et al.  A review of studies on atmospheric mercury in China. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Paolo Mazzetti,et al.  GI-Cat: A Mediation Solution for Building a Clearinghouse Catalog Service , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems & Web Services.

[7]  A. Stohl,et al.  Atmospheric mercury observations from Antarctica: seasonal variation and source and sink region calculations , 2011 .

[8]  O. Lindqvist,et al.  Seasonal and daily variation of mercury evasion at coastal and off shore sites from the Mediterranean Sea , 2007 .

[9]  H. Mao,et al.  Do we understand what the mercury speciation instruments are actually measuring? Results of RAMIX. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  F. Slemr,et al.  Latitudinal distribution of Mercury over the Atlantic Ocean , 1981 .

[11]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  Extensible Markup Language (XML) , 1997, World Wide Web J..

[13]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Terrestial Hg Fluxes: Is the Next Exchange Up, Down, or Neither? , 2005 .

[14]  R. Ebinghaus,et al.  A review of worldwide atmospheric mercury measurements , 2010 .

[15]  R. Stevens,et al.  Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Roy Fielding,et al.  Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures"; Doctoral dissertation , 2000 .

[17]  Elsie M. Sunderland,et al.  Toward the next generation of air quality monitoring: Mercury , 2013 .

[18]  Nicola Pirrone,et al.  Mercury as a Global Pollutant: Sources, Pathways, and Effects , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  R. Mason,et al.  Role of the ocean in the global mercury cycle , 2002 .

[20]  N. Pirrone,et al.  Mercury speciation in the marine boundary layer along a 6000 km cruise path around the Mediterranean Sea , 2003 .

[21]  A. Dommergue,et al.  Spatial coverage and temporal trends of atmospheric mercury measurements in Polar Regions , 2009 .

[22]  Geoffrey C. Fox,et al.  What is cyberinfrastructure , 2010, SIGUCCS '10.

[23]  Assessment Programme,et al.  Final Report of the Workshop on Adaptation of Climate Scenarios to Arctic Climate Impact Assessments, Oslo, May 14-16, 2007. AMAP Report 2007:4. , 2008 .

[24]  R. Mason,et al.  Mercury fate and transport in the global atmosphere : emissions, measurements and models , 2009 .

[25]  F. Slemr,et al.  Emissions of mercury in southern Africa derived from long-term observations at Cape Point, South Africa , 2012 .

[26]  Nicola Pirrone,et al.  Where We Stand on Mercury Pollution and its Health Effects on Regional and Global Scales , 2005 .

[27]  M. Kliment,et al.  Methodology for conformance testing of spatial data infrastructure components including an example of its implementation in Slovakia , 2012 .

[28]  Nicola Pirrone,et al.  Dynamics of mercury pollution on regional and global scales , 2005 .

[29]  Wenche Aas,et al.  Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009 , 2012 .

[30]  R. Mason,et al.  Human impacts on open ocean mercury concentrations , 2007 .

[31]  P. Blanchard,et al.  Trend, seasonal and multivariate analysis study of total gaseous mercury data from the Canadian atmospheric mercury measurement network (CAMNet) , 2007 .

[32]  R. Tordon,et al.  The Atmospheric Mercury Network: measurement and initial examination of an ongoing atmospheric mercury record across North America , 2013 .

[33]  David March,et al.  A multidisciplinary Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Mediterranean to support implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive , 2012, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[34]  F. Slemr,et al.  Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1995 , 2011 .

[35]  Nicola Pirrone,et al.  ICT Methodologies and Spatial Data Infrastructure for Air Quality Information Management , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[36]  N. Pirrone,et al.  Development of a Ground-Based Atmospheric Monitoring Network for the Global Mercury Observation System (GMOS) , 2013 .

[37]  O. Lindqvist,et al.  Evasion of mercury from coastal and open waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea , 2003 .

[38]  B. Schneider,et al.  Variability of the gaseous elemental mercury sea-air flux of the Baltic Sea. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  R. Mason.  Mercury emissions from natural processes and their importance in the global mercury cycle , 2009 .

[40]  W. Fitzgerald,et al.  Gaseous mercury profiles in the tropical Pacific Ocean , 1988 .

[41]  F. Steenhuisen.  AMAP Assessment 2011, Mercury in the Arctic , 2011 .

[42]  Y. Shibata,et al.  Monitoring and modeling projects for fate of Hg species in Japan , 2009 .

[43]  R. Mason,et al.  Spatial coverage and temporal trends of over-water, air-surface exchange, surface and deep sea water mercury measurements , 2009 .

[44]  Xinbin Feng,et al.  Temporal trend and sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at Waliguan GAW station, Northwestern China , 2011 .

[45]  M. Horvat,et al.  Mercury speciation in surface and deep waters of the Mediterranean Sea , 2007 .

[46]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Global Health Impacts and Costs Due to Mercury Emissions , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.