Using chemical reaction network theory to show stability of distributional dynamics in game theory

This article shows how to apply results of chemical reaction network theory (CRNT) to prove uniqueness and stability of a positive equilibrium for pairs/groups distributional dynamics that arise in game theoretic models. Evolutionary game theory assumes that individuals accrue their fitness through interactions with other individuals. When there are two or more different strategies in the population, this theory assumes that pairs (groups) are formed instantaneously and randomly so that the corresponding pairs (groups) distribution is described by the Hardy–Weinberg (binomial) distribution. If interactions times are phenotype dependent the Hardy-Weinberg distribution does not apply. Even if it becomes impossible to calculate the pairs/groups distribution analytically we show that CRNT is a general tool that is very useful to prove not only existence of the equilibrium, but also its stability. In this article, we apply CRNT to pair formation model that arises in two player games (e.g., Hawk-Dove, Prisoner's Dilemma game), to group formation that arises, e.g., in Public Goods Game, and to distribution of a single population in patchy environments. We also show by generalizing the Battle of the Sexes game that the methodology does not always apply.

[1]  J. Heesterbeek,et al.  The saturating contact rate in marriage- and epidemic models , 1993, Journal of mathematical biology.

[2]  F. Horn Necessary and sufficient conditions for complex balancing in chemical kinetics , 1972 .

[3]  R. Cressman,et al.  Interaction times change evolutionary outcomes: Two-player matrix games. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  J. Ledyard Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research , 1994 .

[5]  R. Cressman,et al.  Revisiting the "fallacy of averages" in ecology: Expected gain per unit time equals expected gain divided by expected time. , 2019, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  R. Cressman,et al.  Bimatrix games that include interaction times alter the evolutionary outcome: The Owner-Intruder game. , 2019, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  R. Jackson,et al.  General mass action kinetics , 1972 .

[8]  L. Wardil,et al.  Positive interactions may decrease cooperation in social dilemma experiments , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[9]  K. Sigmund The Calculus of Selfishness , 2010 .

[10]  Martin Feinberg,et al.  Foundations of Chemical Reaction Network Theory , 2019, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[11]  Ananish Chaudhuri,et al.  Recent Advances in Experimental Studies of Social Dilemma Games , 2016, Games.

[12]  Theodore E. Galanthay,et al.  Beyond replicator dynamics: From frequency to density dependent models of evolutionary games. , 2018, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  R. Cressman,et al.  Reducing courtship time promotes marital bliss: The Battle of the Sexes game revisited with costs measured as time lost. , 2020, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  L. Felkins The Social Dilemmas , 2015 .

[15]  R. Cressman,et al.  Defectors’ intolerance of others promotes cooperation in the repeated public goods game with opting out , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[16]  V. Csiszár,et al.  Evolutionary stability for matrix games under time constraints. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Alicia Dickenstein,et al.  Toric dynamical systems , 2007, J. Symb. Comput..

[18]  Mark Broom,et al.  Two-strategy games with time constraints on regular graphs. , 2020, Journal of theoretical biology.