Unbiased Estimation of Selected Treatment Means in Two‐Stage Trials

Straightforward estimation of a treatment's effect in an adaptive clinical trial can be severely hindered when it has been chosen from a larger group of potential candidates. This is because selection mechanisms that condition on the rank order of treatment statistics introduce bias. Nevertheless, designs of this sort are seen as a practical and efficient way to fast track the most promising compounds in drug development. In this paper we extend the method of Cohen and Sackrowitz (1989) who proposed a two-stage unbiased estimate for the best performing treatment at interim. This enables their estimate to work for unequal stage one and two sample sizes, and also when the quantity of interest is the best, second best, or j -th best treatment out of k. The implications of this new flexibility are explored via simulation.

[1]  Nigel Stallard,et al.  Sequential designs for phase III clinical trials incorporating treatment selection , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Confirmatory Seamless Phase II/III Clinical Trials with Hypotheses Selection at Interim: Applications and Practical Considerations , 2006, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[3]  K. Gabriel,et al.  On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance , 1976 .

[4]  Allan R Sampson,et al.  Drop‐the‐Losers Design: Normal Case , 2005, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[5]  Martin Posch,et al.  Issues in designing flexible trials , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  Susan Todd,et al.  Point and interval estimation following a sequential clinical trial , 1996 .

[7]  Richard Simon,et al.  Two-stage selection and testing designs for comparative clinical trials , 1988 .

[8]  Martin Posch,et al.  Testing and estimation in flexible group sequential designs with adaptive treatment selection , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  L Shen,et al.  An improved method of evaluating drug effect in a multiple dose clinical trial , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Nigel Stallard,et al.  Point estimates and confidence regions for sequential trials involving selection , 2005 .

[11]  John Whitehead,et al.  Estimation following selection of the largest of two normal means. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138, 1629-1638. , 2008 .

[12]  Allan R. Sampson,et al.  Extension of a Two-Stage Conditionally Unbiased Estimator of the Selected Population to the Bivariate Normal Case , 2007 .

[13]  M Kieser,et al.  Combining different phases in the development of medical treatments within a single trial. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Harold B. Sackrowitz,et al.  Two stage conditionally unbiased estimators of the selected mean , 1989 .