Identification and Quantification of Uncertainties in a Hydrodynamic River Model Using Expert Opinions

Hydrodynamic river models are applied to design and evaluate measures for purposes such as safety against flooding. The modelling of river processes involves numerous uncertainties, resulting in uncertain model outcomes. Knowledge of the type and magnitude of uncertainties is crucial for a meaningful interpretation of the model results and the usefulness of results in decision making processes. The aim of this study is to identify the sources of uncertainty that contribute most to the uncertainties in the model outcomes and quantify their contribution to the uncertainty in the model outcomes. Experts have been selected based on an objective Pedigree analysis. The selected experts are asked to quantify the most important uncertainties for two situations: (1) the computation of design water levels and (2) the computation of the hydraulic effect of a change in the river bed. For the computation of the design water level, the uncertainties are dominated by the sources that do not change between the calibration and the prediction. The experts state that the upstream discharge and the empirical roughness equation for the main channel have the largest influence on the uncertainty in the modeled water levels. For effect studies, the floodplain bathymetry, weir formulation and discretization of floodplain topography contribute most to the uncertainties in model outcomes. Finally, the contribution of the uncertainties to the model outcomes show that the uncertainties have a significant effect on the predicted water levels, especially under design conditions.

[1]  James S. Risbey,et al.  Uncertainty Assessment of Voc Emissions from Paint in the Netherlands Using the Nusap System , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[2]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review , 2007 .

[3]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error , 2004 .

[4]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[5]  P. Keur,et al.  Identification of Major Sources of Uncertainty in Current IWRM Practice. Illustrated for the Rhine Basin , 2008 .

[6]  David W. Keith,et al.  When is it appropriate to combine expert judgments? , 1996 .

[7]  Keith Beven,et al.  Bayesian updating of flood inundation likelihoods conditioned on flood extent data , 2004 .

[8]  Maarten S. Krol,et al.  Identification and classification of uncertainties in the application of environmental models , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  K. Beven,et al.  Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations , 2005 .

[10]  J. A. Wardekker,et al.  Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface , 2008 .

[11]  J. J. Leendertse,et al.  Aspects of a computational model for long-period water-wave propagation , 1967 .

[12]  R. Cooke.  Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks , 2003 .

[13]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy , 1990 .

[14]  R. Cooke.  Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[15]  H. Groenenberg,et al.  Valueloading And Uncertainty In A Sector-based Differentiation Scheme For Emission Allowances , 2005 .

[16]  Jord Jurriaan Warmink,et al.  Identifying Uncertainty Guidelines for Supporting Policy Making in Water Management Illustrated for Upper Guadiana and Rhine Basins , 2010 .

[17]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  A framework for uncertainty analysis in flood risk management decisions , 2008 .

[18]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Distributed Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Inundation Model Calibration , 2005 .

[20]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  J. Ravetz,et al.  RIVM / MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication : Tool Catalogue for Uncertainty Assessment , 2004 .

[22]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Uncertainties in river basin data at various support scales - Example from Odense Pilot River Basin , 2006 .

[23]  Peggy A. Johnson.  Uncertainty of Hydraulic Parameters , 1996 .

[24]  R. Cooke,et al.  Procedures Guide for Structural Expert Judgement in Accident Consequence Modelling , 2000 .

[25]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Elicitation of Expert Judgments of Uncertainty in the Risk Assessment of Herbicide‐Tolerant Oilseed Crops , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Gene Rowe,et al.  Perspectives on Expertise in the Aggregation of Judgments , 1992 .

[27]  W. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[28]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment , 2002 .