A core outcome set for clinical trials of chemoradiotherapy interventions for anal cancer (CORMAC): a patient and health-care professional consensus.

Chemoradiotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, but variations in the reported outcomes have restricted between-study comparisons. Treatment-related morbidity is considerable; however, no trial has comprehensively quantified long-term side-effects or quality of life. Therefore, we established the first international health-care professional and patient consensus to develop a core outcome set, using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials method. We used the results from our previous systematic review and combined them in this Review with patient interviews to derive a comprehensive list of outcomes, followed by a two-round Delphi survey completed by 149 participants (55 patients and 94 health-care professionals) from 11 countries. The Delphi results were discussed at a consensus meeting of health-care professionals and patients. Agreement was reached on 19 outcomes across four domains: disease activity, survival, toxicity, and life impact. Implementation of the Core Outcome Research Measures in Anal Cancer (CORMAC) set in future trials will serve as a framework to achieve standardisation, facilitate selection of health-area-specific evaluation tools, reduce redundancy of outcome lists, allow between-study comparisons, and ultimately enhance the relevance of trial findings to health-care professionals, trialists, and patients.

[1]  H. Bartelink,et al.  Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Renehan,et al.  Systematic review of outcome measures following chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer (CORMAC) , 2018, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[3]  P. Williamson,et al.  A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey , 2015, Trials.

[4]  M. Mori,et al.  How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  V. Vaitkevicius,et al.  Combined therapy for cancer of the anal canal , 1981, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[6]  Ethan Basch,et al.  The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Jemal,et al.  International trends in anal cancer incidence rates. , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  T. Conroy,et al.  Induction chemotherapy and dose intensification of the radiation boost in locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: final analysis of the randomized UNICANCER ACCORD 03 trial. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Gönen,et al.  Reliability of adverse symptom event reporting by clinicians , 2012, Quality of Life Research.

[10]  R. Glynne-Jones,et al.  Clinical endpoints in trials of chemoradiation for patients with anal cancer. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  R. James Epidermoid anal cancer: results from the UKCCCR randomised trial of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin , 1996, The Lancet.

[12]  R. Forsythe,et al.  Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[13]  J. Ledermann,et al.  Mitomycin or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy for treatment of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, 2 × 2 factorial trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  S. Bentzen,et al.  The need for adverse effects reporting standards in oncology clinical trials. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  D. Sargent,et al.  Meta-analysis for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials , 2009, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  P. Williamson,et al.  Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer , 2017, BMJ Open.

[17]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Nodal stage migration and prognosis in anal cancer: a systematic review, meta-regression, and simulation study. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  N. Petrelli,et al.  Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Jane M Blazeby,et al.  Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider , 2012, Trials.

[20]  K. Whale,et al.  Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Effectiveness Trials in Esophageal Cancer Resection Surgery , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[21]  Hans T. Chung,et al.  Phase I-III development of the EORTC QLQ-ANL27, a health-related quality of life questionnaire for anal cancer. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  Angus G K McNair,et al.  The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 , 2017, Trials.

[23]  L. Schwartz,et al.  When progressive disease does not mean treatment failure: reconsidering the criteria for progression. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  顏素美 Suh-May Yen,et al.  The American Journal of Managed Care , 2015 .

[25]  Charles R. Thomas,et al.  Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, JAMA.

[26]  Caroline B. Terwee,et al.  How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline , 2016, Trials.

[27]  G. Velikova,et al.  Development of an integrated electronic platform for patient self-report and management of adverse events during cancer treatment , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[29]  P. Williamson,et al.  A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  Theresa Schilhab,et al.  Issues to Consider , 2017 .

[31]  Jane M Blazeby,et al.  ORAL PRESENTATIONS , 1993, European Surgical Research.

[32]  V. Vaitkevicius,et al.  Combined therapy for cancer of the anal canal: A preliminary report , 1974, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[33]  Jane M Blazeby,et al.  Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations , 2017, PLoS medicine.

[34]  R. Glynne-Jones,et al.  End points in anal cancer: hopes for a common language. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[36]  Serguei V. S. Pakhomov,et al.  Agreement between patient-reported symptoms and their documentation in the medical record. , 2008, The American journal of managed care.

[37]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Progression-free survival: meaningful or simply measurable? , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.