Prostate biopsy: results and advantages of the transperineal approach—twenty-year experience of a single center

PurposeDetection rate for prostate cancer (PCa) and complications following transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx) were reported.MethodsFrom January 1991 to December 2012, 4,000 men underwent TPBx; from 1991 to 2001, the patients underwent biopsy for suspicious DRE or PSA values >4 ng/mL; moreover, from 2002, the indications were abnormal DRE, PSA >10 ng/mL, PSA values between 4.1 and 10, 2.6 and 4 and <2.5 ng/mL with F/T PSA <25, <20 <15 %, respectively. In case of initial biopsy, the number of needles cores increased from 6 (1991–1996) to 12 (1997–2012) and 18 cores (2002–2012); in case of repeat biopsy, since 2005 a saturation biopsy (SPBx) with >24 cores was performed.ResultsOverall, PCa, normal parenchyma, HGPIN and ASAP were found in 1,379 (34.5 %), 2,400 (60 %), 175 (4.4 %) and 46 (1.1 %) patients, respectively; in case of initial TPBx, the scheme at 18 showed a greater PCa detection in comparison with scheme at 6–12 cores (p < 0.05). In case of repeat biopsy, a higher detection of microfocus of cancer was found performing a SPBx; moreover, 15 % of cancers were localized in the anterior zone. Incidence of hemospermia and urinary retention were correlated with the number of needle cores resulting equal to 30.4 versus 11.1 % in case of SPBx (p < 0.05); moreover, none developed sepsis.ConclusionsTransperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx) resets the risk of sepsis; moreover, in case of repeat SPBx, the transperineal approach detects a high number of significant PCa localized in the anterior zone (15 % of the cases).

[1]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Trans-rectal versus trans-perineal saturation rebiopsy of the prostate: is there a difference in cancer detection rate? , 2011, Urology.

[2]  J. Nesland,et al.  Transperineal prostate biopsy detects significant cancer in patients with elevated prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous negative transrectal biopsies , 2012, BJU international.

[3]  F. Aragona,et al.  Incidence of insignificant prostate cancer using free/total PSA: results of a case-finding protocol on 14 453 patients , 2010, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. , 2012, European urology.

[5]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Location and pathological characteristics of cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens identified by transperineal biopsy compared to transrectal biopsy. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[6]  F. Aragona,et al.  Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation. , 2007, Urology.

[7]  D Andrew Loblaw,et al.  Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[8]  W. Butler,et al.  Incidence and pathological features of prostate cancer detected on transperineal template guided mapping biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[9]  H. Zeng,et al.  The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Asian journal of andrology.

[10]  Benjamin E Ayres,et al.  The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in restaging men with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance , 2012, BJU international.

[11]  F. Aragona,et al.  Prostate Needle Biopsy: 12 vs. 18 Cores – Is It Necessary? , 2005, Urologia Internationalis.

[12]  K. Wallner,et al.  Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting , 2009, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[13]  S. Berndt,et al.  Is repeat prostate biopsy associated with a greater risk of hospitalization? Data from SEER-Medicare. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[14]  J. Kepner,et al.  Transperineal prostate biopsy: analysis of a uniform core sampling pattern that yields data on tumor volume limits in negative biopsies , 2010, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[15]  A. Edwards Is It Necessary , 1986 .

[16]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[17]  G. Heap,et al.  Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy , 2005, ANZ journal of surgery.

[18]  H Ballentine Carter,et al.  Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[19]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Can the core length involved with prostate cancer identify clinically insignificant disease in low risk patients diagnosed on the basis of a single positive core? , 2003, Urologic oncology.

[20]  Rodolfo Montironi,et al.  Contemporary Role of Systematic Prostate Biopsies: Indications, Techniques, and Implications for Patient Care , 2013 .

[21]  N. Mabjeesh,et al.  High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound‐guided template saturation biopsy , 2012, BJU international.

[22]  Y. Ishikawa,et al.  Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer , 2007, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[23]  M. Toublanc,et al.  Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[24]  Pingkun Yan,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[25]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  F. Pietropaolo,et al.  Prostate cancer detection at repeat biopsy: can pelvic phased-array multiparametric MRI replace saturation biopsy? , 2013, Anticancer research.

[27]  M. Melamed,et al.  Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[28]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[29]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[30]  P. Walsh,et al.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. , 1994, JAMA.

[31]  H. Lepor,et al.  Blood loss during radical prostatectomy: impact on clinical, oncological and functional outcomes and complication rates , 2012, BJU international.