Wireless performance and mobile fronthaul bandwidth of uplink joint reception with LLR combining in split-PHY processing

In this paper, we evaluate the wireless uplink performance and the mobile fronthaul (MFH) bandwidth of split-physical layer (PHY) processing (SPP), which is a base station (BS) functional split scheme used to link baseband units (BBUs) and remote radio heads (RRHs) in a centralized/cloud — radio access network (C-RAN). SPP enables MFH bandwidth reduction by splitting the BS functions between channel coding/decoding and modulation/demodulation within the PHY layer functions. SPP also enables high coordinated multipoint (CoMP) transmission and reception performance by employing uplink joint reception (JR) with log likelihood ratio (LLR) combining. Link level simulation results show that SPP with LLR combining achieves a block error rate (BLER) performance of 10% with a signal to noise ratio (SNR) penalty of less than 1 dB compared with that of conventional CRAN, which centralizes PHY layer functions in BBU. In addition, SPP has an SNR gain of more than 3 dB over medium access control (MAC)-PHY split, which splits the BS functions between the MAC and PHY layer functions. System level simulation results show that SPP with LLR combining improves the cell-edge user throughput by more than 33% over MAC-PHY split with selection combining and reduces the MFH bandwidth by 91% when compared with conventional C-RAN. Moreover, link and system level simulation results above are also observed when the channel estimation is non-ideal.

[1]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  5G Ultra-Dense Cellular Networks , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[2]  Kenji Miyamoto,et al.  Uplink Joint Reception with LLR Forwarding for Optical Transmission Bandwidth Reduction in Mobile Fronthaul , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[3]  C-ran the Road towards Green Ran , 2022 .

[4]  Jun-ichi Kani,et al.  Options for future mobile backhaul and fronthaul , 2015 .

[5]  Paola Bisaglia,et al.  Simplified soft-output demapper for binary interleaved COFDM with application to HIPERLAN/2 , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[6]  Jens Bartelt,et al.  Towards a flexible functional split for cloud-RAN networks , 2014, 2014 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC).

[7]  Tommy Svensson,et al.  The role of small cells, coordinated multipoint, and massive MIMO in 5G , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  R. Buehrer,et al.  The impact of channel estimation error on space-time block codes , 2002, Proceedings IEEE 56th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[9]  Jin Yang,et al.  Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (EUTRAN) , 2017 .

[10]  Kenji Miyamoto,et al.  System level performance of uplink transmission in split-PHY processing architecture with joint reception for future radio access , 2015, 2015 IEEE 26th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[11]  Frank Schaich,et al.  Quantitative analysis of split base station processing and determination of advantageous architectures for LTE , 2013, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[12]  Gerald Matz,et al.  Quantization for soft-output demodulators in bit-interleaved coded modulation systems , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[13]  Kenji Miyamoto,et al.  Performance evaluation of ethernet- based mobile fronthaul and wireless comp in split-PHY processing , 2017, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.