Estimation of plant area index and phenological transition dates from digital repeat photography and radiometric approaches in a hardwood forest in the Northeastern United States

Abstract Long-term, continuous digital camera imagery and tower-based radiometric monitoring were conducted at a representative hardwood forest site in the Northeastern United States, part of the AmeriFlux network. In this study, the phenological metrics of the leaf area index (LAI), plant area index (PAI) and associated transition dates (e.g., timing of the onset of leaf expansion and the cessation of leaf fall) were compared using 4-year of data from Bartlett Experimental Forest. We used digital repeat photography (DRP) imagery collected using two different methods (“canopy cover” and “phenocam” approaches), together with above- and below-canopy measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). The growth-period LAI estimated from canopy cover images (LAI CANOPY ) and the above and below canopy PAR measurements (LAI fPARt ) were within approximately the same range, in term of magnitude, as previous results for multiple comparative methods, although growing-season LAI CANOPY was slightly lower (3.11 m 2  m −2 to 3.35 m 2  m −2 ) than LAI fPARt (3.19 m 2  m −2 to 3.67 m 2  m −2 ). In addition, we derived phenological transition dates from PAI CANOPY , PAI fPARt , and color-based metrics calculated from the phenocam imagery (green (G CC ) and red (R CC ) chromatic coordinates). The transition dates in both spring and autumn differed somewhat according to method, presumably due to the vegetation status detection abilities of each vegetation metric. We found that LAI estimation from canopy cover images may be influenced by automatic exposure settings, which limits the ability to detect subtle changes in phenology during the transition phases in both spring and autumn. Particularly in autumn, the color-based metrics calculated from the phenocam imagery are decoupled from leaf area dynamics and thus PAI. While above and below canopy PAR measurements could yield the better indicators for estimating LAI, its seasonal dynamics, and associated phenological transition dates in long-term monitoring, we argue that there are obvious benefits to the multi-sensor approach used here.

[1]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest , 2007, Oecologia.

[2]  Cemal Melih Tanis,et al.  Digital photography for assessing the link between vegetation phenology and CO2 exchange in two contrasting northern ecosystems , 2016, Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems.

[3]  Craig Macfarlane,et al.  Classification method of mixed pixels does not affect canopy metrics from digital images of forest overstorey , 2011 .

[4]  Paul L. Rosin.  Unimodal thresholding , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  John M. Norman,et al.  Characterization of radiation regimes in nonrandom forest canopies: theory, measurements, and a simplified modeling approach. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[6]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests , 2005 .

[7]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Digital repeat photography for phenological research in forest ecosystems , 2012 .

[8]  Alfredo Huete,et al.  Parameterization of an ecosystem light-use-efficiency model for predicting savanna GPP using MODIS EVI , 2014 .

[9]  Craig Macfarlane,et al.  Measurement of Crown Cover and Leaf Area Index Using Digital Cover Photography and Its Application to Remote Sensing , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[10]  T. Keenan.  Phenology: Spring greening in a warming world , 2015, Nature.

[11]  P. Newbould,et al.  Methods of Estimating the Primary Production of Forests. , 1968 .

[12]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Ecological impacts of a widespread frost event following early spring leaf‐out , 2012 .

[13]  Oliver Sonnentag,et al.  Greenness indices from digital cameras predict the timing and seasonal dynamics of canopy-scale photosynthesis. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  David Y. Hollinger,et al.  Leaf area index uncertainty estimates for model-data fusion applications , 2011 .

[15]  S. Trudgill.  The Terrestrial Biosphere , 2000 .

[16]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery , 2014 .

[17]  J. Mustard,et al.  Beyond leaf color: Comparing camera‐based phenological metrics with leaf biochemical, biophysical, and spectral properties throughout the growing season of a temperate deciduous forest , 2014 .

[18]  J. Proctor,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STUDIES IN FOUR CONTRASTING LOWLAND RAIN FORESTS IN GUNUNG MULU NATIONAL PARK, SARAWAK II. LITTERFALL, LITTER STANDING CROP AND PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON HERBIVORY , 1983 .

[19]  Reiko Ide,et al.  Use of digital cameras for phenological observations , 2010, Ecol. Informatics.

[20]  Elizabeth R. Ellwood,et al.  Record-Breaking Early Flowering in the Eastern United States , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  Youngryel Ryu,et al.  Digital canopy photography: Exposed and in the raw , 2014 .

[22]  Andrew D Richardson,et al.  Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[23]  Andrea Cutini,et al.  Estimation of canopy properties in deciduous forests with digital hemispherical and cover photography , 2013 .

[24]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  Continuous observation of tree leaf area index at ecosystem scale using upward-pointing digital cameras , 2012 .

[25]  A. Strahler,et al.  Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS , 2003 .

[26]  Andrew D. Richardson,et al.  Near-Surface Sensor-Derived Phenology , 2013 .

[27]  S. T. Gower,et al.  A cross‐biome comparison of daily light use efficiency for gross primary production , 2003 .

[28]  Y. Xue,et al.  Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis , 2012 .

[29]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  Phenology Feedbacks on Climate Change , 2009, Science.

[30]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding , 2015, Nature.

[31]  O. Sonnentag,et al.  Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system , 2013 .

[32]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Measuring Effective Leaf Area Index, Foliage Profile, and Stand Height in New England Forest Stands Using a Full-Waveform Ground-Based Lidar , 2011 .

[33]  M. Friedl,et al.  Tracking forest phenology and seasonal physiology using digital repeat photography: a critical assessment. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[34]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  How to quantify tree leaf area index in an open savanna ecosystem: A multi-instrument and multi-model approach , 2010 .

[35]  R. McMurtrie,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest using digital photography , 2007 .

[36]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Refining light-use efficiency calculations for a deciduous forest canopy using simultaneous tower-based carbon flux and radiometric measurements , 2007 .