Dynamic analysis of a lean cell under uncertainty

One of the ultimate targets of lean manufacturing paradigm is to balance production and produce at takt time in production cells. This paper investigates the performance of a lean cell that implements the previous lean goals under uncertainty. The investigation is based on a system dynamics approach to model a dynamic lean cell. Backlog is used as a performance metric that reflects the cell's responsiveness. The cell performance is compared under certain and uncertain external (demand) and internal (machine availability) conditions. Results showed that although lean cell is expected to be responsive to external demand with minimum waste, however, this was not the case under the considered uncertain conditions. The paper proposes an approach to mitigate this problem through employing dynamic capacity policy. Furthermore, the paper explores the effect of the delay associated with the proposed capacity policies and how they affect the lean cell performance. Finally, various recommendations are presented to better manage the dynamics of lean manufacturing systems.

[1]  W. T. Huh,et al.  A general strategic capacity planning model under demand uncertainty , 2006 .

[2]  Mehmet Savsar,et al.  Simulation analysis of just-in-time production systems , 1995 .

[3]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Defining and developing measures of lean production , 2007 .

[4]  Walter Eversheim,et al.  The application of axiomatic design and lean management principles in the scope of production system segmentation , 2000 .

[5]  G. Thompson,et al.  Optimal Control Theory: Applications to Management Science and Economics , 2000 .

[6]  Sandra S. Lash,et al.  Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Satisfaction , 2009 .

[7]  A. Posner Learning to see. , 1955, Eye, ear, nose & throat monthly.

[8]  Bopaya Bidanda,et al.  A multi-objective model for project portfolio selection to implement lean and Six Sigma concepts , 2008 .

[9]  Melissa Sampson,et al.  Nonprofit, Payload Process Improvement Through Lean Management , 2004 .

[10]  H. Van Landeghem,et al.  Analysing the effects of Lean manufacturing using a value stream mapping-based simulation generator , 2007 .

[11]  Peter Middleton,et al.  Lean Software Development: Two Case Studies , 2001, Software Quality Journal.

[12]  Len Tischler Bringing Lean To the Office , 2006 .

[13]  Jon C. Yingling,et al.  Quantifying benefits of conversion to lean manufacturing with discrete event simulation: A case study , 2000 .

[14]  Rakesh Nagi,et al.  A review of agile manufacturing systems , 2001 .

[15]  Charles R. Standridge,et al.  Analysis in Manufacturing Systems Simulation: A Case Study , 1994, Simul..

[16]  R. Schonberger Japanese manufacturing techniques : nine hidden lessons simplicity , 1982 .

[17]  J. Cutcher-Gershenfeld,et al.  Lean Thinking , 2019, Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management.

[18]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools , 2003 .

[19]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Learning to see , 1996 .

[20]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint , 1989 .

[21]  Jt Black,et al.  Design rules for implementing the Toyota Production System , 2007 .

[22]  D. Morrice,et al.  The “physics” of capacity and backlog management in service and custom manufacturing supply chains , 2005 .

[23]  Vishal S Mistry,et al.  A REVIEW ON AGILE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM , 2014 .

[24]  Ronald G. Askin,et al.  Defining inventory control points in multiproduct stochastic pull systems , 2009 .

[25]  Isabelina Nahmens,et al.  Mass customization strategies and their relationship to lean production in the homebuilding industry , 2007 .

[26]  John G. Carlson,et al.  Mixed model assembly simulation , 1992 .

[27]  P. S. Welgama,et al.  Use of simulation in the design of a JIT system , 1995 .