The Use of Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Adaptive Randomization in Biomarker-Driven Phase II Studies

The role of biomarkers has increased in cancer clinical trials such that novel designs are needed to efficiently answer questions of both drug effects and biomarker performance. We advocate Bayesian hierarchical models for response-adaptive randomized phase II studies integrating single or multiple biomarkers. Prior selection allows one to control a gradual and seamless transition from randomized-blocks to marker-enrichment during the trial. Adaptive randomization is an efficient design for evaluating treatment efficacy within biomarker subgroups, with less variable final sample sizes when compared to nested staged designs. Inference based on the Bayesian hierarchical model also has improved performance in identifying the sub-population where therapeutics are effective over independent analyses done within each biomarker subgroup.

[1]  M. Zelen,et al.  Play the Winner Rule and the Controlled Clinical Trial , 1969 .

[2]  Boris Freidlin,et al.  Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: design issues. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[4]  D. V. Van Dyke,et al.  HER-2/neu Testing in Breast Cancer. , 2003, Journal of the Association of Genetic Technologists.

[5]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  A predictive approach to selecting the size of a clinical trial, based on subjective clinical opinion. , 1986, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Randomized Trials , 1994, Bayesian Biostatistics.

[7]  P. Thall,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian approaches to phase II trials in diseases with multiple subtypes , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  J. Olson,et al.  Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype--ACOSOG Z1031. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[10]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Asymptotic properties of doubly adaptive biased coin designs for multitreatment clinical trials , 2003 .

[11]  B. Vanhaesebroeck,et al.  The emerging mechanisms of isoform-specific PI3K signalling , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[12]  J. Baselga,et al.  Status of PI3K inhibition and biomarker development in cancer therapeutics. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  R. Kass,et al.  Approximate Bayesian Inference in Conditionally Independent Hierarchical Models (Parametric Empirical Bayes Models) , 1989 .

[14]  N Stallard,et al.  Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials , 2001, Biometrics.

[15]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. , 1999, Science.

[16]  C. Adcock Sample size determination : a review , 1997 .

[17]  J. Matthews,et al.  Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice; , 2003 .

[18]  W. Sauerbrei,et al.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  S. D. Durham,et al.  A sequential design for maximizing the probability of a favourable response , 1998 .

[20]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  A play-the-winner-type urn design with reduced variability , 2003 .

[21]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Randomized Play-the-Winner Rule in Medical Trials , 1978 .

[22]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer genes and the pathways they control , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[23]  D. Berry Bayesian clinical trials , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[24]  D. Berry,et al.  I‐SPY 2: An Adaptive Breast Cancer Trial Design in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[25]  J. Foekens,et al.  Identification, validation, and clinical implementation of tumor-associated biomarkers to improve therapy concepts, survival, and quality of life of cancer patients: tasks of the Receptor and Biomarker Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. , 2004, International journal of oncology.

[26]  Boris Freidlin,et al.  Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Randomized phase II trials: time for a new era in clinical trial design. , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[28]  Joseph G Ibrahim,et al.  Bayesian Design of Noninferiority Trials for Medical Devices Using Historical Data , 2011, Biometrics.

[29]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[30]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Asymptotic Inference with Response-Adaptive Treatment Allocation Designs , 1993 .

[31]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[32]  Michael Woodroofe,et al.  Central Limit Theorems for Doubly Adaptive Biased Coin Designs , 1995 .

[33]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[34]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian Adaptive Methods for Clinical Trials , 2010 .

[35]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Continuous Bayesian adaptive randomization based on event times with covariates , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[36]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  Bayesian adaptive design for targeted therapy development in lung cancer — a step toward personalized medicine , 2008, Clinical trials.

[37]  A. Nobel,et al.  Concordance among Gene-Expression – Based Predictors for Breast Cancer , 2011 .

[38]  M S Pepe,et al.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[39]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Monitoring clinical trials: conditional or predictive power? , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[40]  M. A. Best Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health‐Care Evaluation , 2005 .

[41]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[42]  Wayne A. Phillips,et al.  Mutation of the PIK3CA Gene in Ovarian and Breast Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[43]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Seamlessly Expanding a Randomized Phase II Trial to Phase III , 2002, Biometrics.

[44]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[46]  M. Cazzaniga,et al.  Prognostic significance of Ki-67 labeling index after short-term presurgical tamoxifen in women with ER-positive breast cancer. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[47]  Adam M. Gustafson,et al.  An integration of complementary strategies for gene-expression analysis to reveal novel therapeutic opportunities for breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[48]  Soonmyung Paik,et al.  Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[49]  Donald A Berry,et al.  Introduction to Bayesian methods III: use and interpretation of Bayesian tools in design and analysis , 2005, Clinical trials.

[50]  G. Ginsburg,et al.  The path to personalized medicine. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[51]  M. Piccart,et al.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation: Spiegelhalter/Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation , 2004 .