Microarray Scanner Performance Over a Five-Week Period as Measured With Cy5 and Cy3 Serial Dilution Slides

To investigate scanner performance and guide development of an instrument qualification method, slides with replicates of successive dilutions of cyanine 5 (Cy5) and cyanine 3 (Cy3) dyes (referred to as dye slides) were scanned. The successive dilutions form a dose-response curve from which performance can be assessed. The effects of a variety of factors, including the number of scans and slide storage conditions, on scanner performance over a five-week period were investigated and tracked with time series charts of dye signal intensity, signal-to-noise (S/N), signal background, slope, and limit of detection (LOD). Scanner drift was tracked with a known stable reference material, Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2242. The greatest effect on the figures of merit was the dye, with the Cy5 dye showing signs of degradation after one week of scanning independent of all other factors while the Cy3 dye remained relatively stable. Use of the charts to track scanner performance over time holds promise for development of a method for microarray scanner performance qualification. Although not a prescription for performance qualification, this introductory study provides sufficient information regarding the use of dye slides to enable the user to institute a preliminary test method.

[1]  L. Reid,et al.  Proposed methods for testing and selecting the ERCC external RNA controls , 2005, BMC Genomics.

[2]  Johan Vallon-Christersson,et al.  Calibration and assessment of channel-specific biases in microarray data with extended dynamical range , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  Yaxian Shi,et al.  How to Evaluate a Microarray Scanner , 2009 .

[4]  P. M. Clifford,et al.  The international vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology , 1985 .

[5]  J. Fowler,et al.  Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING Gaithersburg , MD June 12-13 , 2000 , 2000 .

[6]  Marc Salit,et al.  Standards in gene expression microarray experiments. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[7]  Edgar S. Etz,et al.  Relative Intensity Correction of Raman Spectrometers: NIST SRMs 2241 through 2243 for 785 nm, 532 nm, and 488 nm/514.5 nm Excitation , 2007, Applied spectroscopy.

[8]  Oswaldo Trelles,et al.  Saturation and Quantization Reduction in Microarray Experiments using Two Scans at Different Sensitivities , 2004, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[9]  B. Ondruschka,et al.  Contribution to the Qualification of Technical Microwave Systems and to the Validation of Microwave‐Assisted Reactions and Processes , 2005 .

[10]  E. Hovig,et al.  Profound influence of microarray scanner characteristics on gene expression ratios: analysis and procedure for correction , 2004, BMC Genomics.

[11]  Maqc Consortium.  The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Tao Han,et al.  Microarray scanner calibration curves: characteristics and implications , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[13]  Thomas Layloff,et al.  Qualification of analytical instruments for use in the pharmaceutical industry: A scientific approach , 2004, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[14]  Kevin R Coombes,et al.  Sources of nonlinearity in cDNA microarray expression measurements , 2001, Genome Biology.

[15]  Microarray image scanning. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.