Radiation exposure associated with imaging of the chest

Exposure to ionizing radiation due to radiologic examinations is associated with the risk of induction of malignancy. This has to be balanced against the potential benefits of detection of a malignant tumor with radiologic examinations. For comparison of radiation exposure levels from different sources, the concept of effective dose equivalent was developed, which is used to assess an individual's risk of developing malignancy. Effective dose equivalent ranges from 0.06 to 0.25 millisieverts (mSv) with chest radiography in 2 views, 3–27 mSv with computed tomography (CT) using conventional examination parameters, and 0.3–0.55 mSv using low dose CT settings. These values can be compared with radiation exposure levels from natural sources (on average 2.4 mSv per year in Germany). Based on considerations by the International Commission on Radiological Protection, it can be expected that radiation exposure with an effective dose equivalent of 1 mSv would lead to 5 additional malignancies in 100,000 individuals exposed. Cancer 2000;89:2457–60. © 2000 American Cancer Society.

[1]  P. Vock,et al.  Radiation exposure of patients who undergo CT of the trunk. , 1995, Radiology.

[2]  J. Wade,et al.  CT standard protocols are of limited value in assessing actual patient dose. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  J. Geleijns,et al.  Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  J E Aldrich,et al.  Chronic infiltrative lung disease: comparison of diagnostic accuracies of radiography and low- and conventional-dose thin-section CT. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  K. Nishizawa,et al.  Determinations of organ doses and effective dose equivalents from computed tomographic examination. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  T M Yelbuz,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT. , 1999, Radiology.

[7]  W. Kersjes,et al.  Diagnosis of pulmonary metastases with turbo-SE MR imaging , 1997, European Radiology.

[8]  D. Panicek.  MR imaging for pulmonary metastases? , 1992, Radiology.

[9]  D. McCauley,et al.  Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. , 1990, Radiology.

[10]  B. Wall,et al.  Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  K S Lee,et al.  CT of the chest: minimal tube current required for good image quality with the least radiation dose. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  W. Travis,et al.  Pulmonary metastases: MR imaging with surgical correlation--a prospective study. , 1992, Radiology.