A preliminary in vivo study on the potential application of e-tracking in poultry using ink printed 2D barcodes

A preliminary study on the potential application of electronic tracking in poultry in vivo has been conducted. The experimental procedure for this study was based on previous in vitro findings (Froschle et al., 2009) as part of the same research programme. The study consisted of two phases whereby an initial experiment using inkjet printing of 10x10 DataMatrix barcodes onto the beaks of broiler chickens in a live commercial setting has been carried out. Results demonstrated very poor percentage of readability after a short period of time. Barcodes deteriorated very rapidly and this was attributed to the physical effects on the barcodes of the actions of the chickens in a commercial environment, together with the inability of the ink to bond to the hard keratinous surface of the beak. In a subsequent part of the study, a number of commercially available ink types were screened, using a predetermined abrasion testing procedure, for their ability to bond to the beak and provide a readable barcode on the beaks following some predetermined graduated physical abrasion.

[1]  R. Dennis,et al.  Different effects of individual identification systems on chicken well-being. , 2008, Poultry science.

[2]  Gerard Corkery,et al.  A preliminary investigation of avian comb as a potential biometric marker for identification of poultry. , 2008 .

[3]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Consumer perceptions of food quality and safety and their relation to traceability , 2008 .

[4]  C. Nicol,et al.  Social influences on the comfort behaviour of laying hens , 1989 .

[5]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  The Emerging Role of Traceability and Information in Demand-Oriented Livestock Production , 2001 .

[6]  R. S. Vincent,et al.  Datamatrix and PDF417 data integrity test , 1993 .

[7]  Francis Butler,et al.  Original papers: A longitudinal study of the effect of time on the matching performance of a retinal recognition system for lambs , 2008 .

[8]  M Fallon,et al.  Traceability of poultry and poultry products. , 2001, Revue scientifique et technique.

[9]  Roger C. Palmer,et al.  The bar code book : reading, printing, and specification of bar code symbols , 1989 .

[10]  B. Campbell,et al.  A Dictionary of birds , 1985 .

[11]  D. Clayton,et al.  Relationship of bill morphology to grooming behaviour in birds , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  J. Burger,et al.  Evidence for social facilitation of preening in the common tern , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Francis Butler,et al.  Using Muzzle Pattern Recognition as a Biometric Approach for Cattle Identification , 2007 .

[14]  Francis Butler,et al.  Assessment of retinal recognition technology as a biometric method for sheep identification , 2008 .

[15]  I. Duncan,et al.  An analysis of displacement preening in the domestic fowl , 1972 .

[16]  Francis Butler,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation on Face Recognition as a Biometric Identifier of Sheep , 2007 .

[17]  F. Schwägele.  Traceability from a European perspective. , 2005, Meat science.

[18]  J. Baumel,et al.  Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium , 1993 .

[19]  Charlie Plain‐Jones.  Data matrix identification , 1995 .

[20]  Shane Ward,et al.  Investigation of the potential use of e-tracking and tracing of poultry using linear and 2D barcodes , 2009 .

[21]  J. McKean,et al.  The importance of traceability for public health and consumer protection. , 2001, Revue scientifique et technique.

[22]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Pathways to increase consumer trust in meat as a safe and wholesome food. , 2006, Meat science.