The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: a social network analysis

This paper applies the methodological tools typical of social network analysis (SNA) within an evolutionary framework, to investigate the knowledge-base (KB) dynamics of the biotechnology sector. Knowledge is here considered a collective good represented as a co-relational and a retrieval-interpretative structure. The internal structure of knowledge is described as a network, the nodes of which are small units within traces of knowledge, such as patent documents, connected by links determined by their joint utilization. We used measures referring to the network (like density) and to its nodes (like degree, closeness and betweenness centrality) to provide a synthetic description of the structure of the KB and of its evolution over time. Eventually, we compared such measures with more established properties of the KB calculated on the basis of co-occurrences of technological classes within patent documents. Empirical results show the existence of interesting and meaningful relationships across the different measures, providing support for the use of SNA to study the evolution of the KBs of industrial sectors and their lifecycles.

[1]  F. Hayek.  Economics and knowledge , 1937 .

[2]  C. Freeman,et al.  The Economics of Industrial Innovation - 3rd Edition , 1997 .

[3]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field , 2007 .

[4]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Entropy Statistics as a Framework to Analyse Technological Evolution , 2004 .

[5]  F. Quatraro,et al.  The Dynamics of Technological Knowledge: From Linearity to Recombination , 2010 .

[6]  L. Nesta.  Knowledge and productivity in the world's largest manufacturing corporations , 2008 .

[7]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  On the dynamics of generation and utilisation of knowledge: The local character of knowledge , 2007 .

[8]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[9]  A. Stirling.  A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[11]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Firm knowledge and market value in biotechnology , 2006 .

[12]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Innovation Networks in Biotechnology , 2008 .

[13]  S. Winter,et al.  Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[14]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Evolution of the Knowledge Base in Knowledge Intensive Sectors , 2009 .

[15]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Centrality in Social Networks , 1993 .

[16]  Andrew D. Barbour,et al.  Stein's Method And Applications , 2005 .

[17]  W. E. Silver,et al.  Economics and Information Theory , 1967 .

[18]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  Considerations about the Production and Utilization of Knowledge , 2004 .

[19]  Jackie Krafft,et al.  Entry, exit and knowledge: evidence from a cluster in the info-communications , 2004 .

[20]  E. Giuliani.  The Selective Nature of Knowledge Networks in Clusters: Evidence from the Wine Industry , 2007 .

[21]  P. Saviotti,et al.  On the Life Cycle of Knowledge Intensive Sectors , 2006 .

[22]  Andrea Morrison,et al.  Gatekeepers of Knowledge within Industrial Districts: Who They Are, How They Interact , 2008 .

[23]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Technological innovation and complexity theory , 2006 .

[24]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Knowledge as a Set in Idea Space: An Epistemological View on Growth , 2000 .

[25]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[26]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[27]  P. Saviotti.  Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy , 1996 .

[28]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  Innovation and Structural Change in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology , 1994 .

[29]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2009 .

[30]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[31]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[32]  Gert Sabidussi,et al.  The centrality index of a graph , 1966 .

[33]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[34]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[35]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Coherence of the Knowledge Base and the Firm's Innovative Performance: Evidence from the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry , 2005 .

[36]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Export variety and the economic performance of countries , 2008 .

[37]  Jackie Krafft,et al.  The dynamics of technological knowledge , 2011 .

[38]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Considerations about the Production In Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Law , 2004 .

[39]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Localised Technological Change: Towards the Economics of Complexity , 2008 .

[40]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[41]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[42]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[44]  Sai Yayavaram,et al.  Decomposability in Knowledge Structures and Its Impact on the Usefulness of Inventions and Knowledge-base Malleability , 2008 .

[45]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[46]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[47]  C. Antonelli.  Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change , 2011 .

[48]  L. Anselin,et al.  Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge , 2002 .

[49]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[50]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Information, variety and entropy in technoeconomic development☆ , 1988 .