It is no more useful for researchers to acknowledge simply that subjectivity is an invariable component of their research than it is for them to assert that their ideal is to achieve objectivity. Acknowledgments and assertions are not sufficient. Beginning with the premise that subjectivity is inevitable, this paper argues that researchers should systematically seek out their subjectivity, not retrospectively when the data have been collected and the analysis is complete, but while their research is actively in progress. The purpose of doing so is to enable researchers to be aware of how their subjectivity may be shaping their inquiry and its outcomes. In this paper I demonstrate the pursuit of my subjectivity in the course of year-long fieldwork in a multiethnic high school.
[1]
F. Erickson,et al.
WHAT MAKES SCHOOL ETHNOGRAPHY “ETHNOGRAPHIC?”
,
1973
.
[2]
C. Geertz,et al.
The Interpretation of Cultures
,
1973
.
[3]
Morris Freilich.
Marginal natives at work: Anthropologists in the field
,
1977
.
[4]
A. Peshkin.
Growing up American: Schooling and the survival of community
,
1978
.
[5]
Shulamit Reinharz,et al.
On becoming a social scientist
,
1979
.
[6]
J. Susskind.
The Imperfect Union: School Consolidation and Community Conflictby Alan Peshkin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982. 207 pp
,
1984
.
[7]
Susan Krieger,et al.
Beyond “subjectivity”: The use of the self in social science
,
1985
.
[8]
God's Choice: The Total World of a Fundamentalist Christian School.
,
1989
.
[9]
God's Choice: The Total World of a Fundamentalist Christian School.By Alan Peshkin. University of Chicago Press, 1986. 349 pp. $24.95
,
1988
.