Scale effects in friction of single–asperity contacts. I. From concurrent slip to single–dislocation–assisted slip

A micromechanical dislocation model of frictional slip between two asperities is presented. The model suggests that when the contact radius is smaller than a critical value, the friction stress is constant, of the order of the theoretical shear strength, in agreement with reported atomic force microscope (AFM) friction experiments. However, at the critical value there is a transition beyond which the friction stress decreases with increasing area, until it reaches the second transition where the friction stress gradually becomes independent of the contact size. This is in contrast to previous theories, which assume that the friction stress is always independent of the size. The present model also predicts that the mechanisms of slip are size dependent. Before the first transition, the constant friction stress is associated with concurrent slip without the aid of dislocation motion. The first transition corresponds to the minimum contact size at which a single dislocation loop is nucleated and sweeps through the whole contact interface, resulting in a single–dislocation–assisted (SDA) slip. This mechanism is predicted to prevail for a wide range of contact sizes, from 10 nm to 10 µm in radius for typical dry adhesive contacts; however, there are no available experimental data in this size range. The second transition is found to be caused by the effective Peierls stress which stabilizes the dislocation loop within the contact region, resulting in dislocation pile–ups. Beyond the second transition, slip is assisted by cooperative glide of dislocations in the pile–up. For sufficiently large contacts the mechanism of cooperative glide induces a size–independent friction stress, in agreement with observations in surface force apparatus (SFA) friction experiments. This paper (Part I) addresses the first transition: from concurrent slip to SDA slip. The second transition is analysed in a companion paper (Part II).

[1]  Raymond D. Mindlin,et al.  Compliance of elastic bodies in contact , 1949 .

[2]  D. Maugis,et al.  Fracture mechanics and the adherence of viscoelastic bodies , 1978 .

[3]  John R. Rice,et al.  Stresses Due to a Sharp Notch in a Work-Hardening Elastic-Plastic Material Loaded by Longitudinal Shear , 1967 .

[4]  D. Maugis.  Adhesion of spheres : the JKR-DMT transition using a dugdale model , 1992 .

[5]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  M. F. Kanninen,et al.  Inelastic Behavior of Solids , 1970, Science.

[7]  J. D. Eshelby,et al.  The force on an elastic singularity , 1951, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  J. Hirth,et al.  Theory of Dislocations (2nd ed.) , 1983 .

[9]  J. Rice,et al.  Conservation Laws and Energy-Release Rates , 1973 .

[10]  James R. Rice,et al.  Ductile versus brittle behaviour of crystals , 1974 .

[11]  F. P. Bowden,et al.  The Friction and Lubrication of Solids , 1964 .

[12]  M. Peach,et al.  THE FORCES EXERTED ON DISLOCATIONS AND THE STRESS FIELDS PRODUCED BY THEM , 1950 .

[13]  D. F. Ogletree,et al.  Atomic Force Microscopy Study of an Ideally Hard Contact: The Diamond(111)/Tungsten Carbide Interface , 1998 .

[14]  Robert W. Carpick,et al.  Measurement of interfacial shear (friction) with an ultrahigh vacuum atomic force microscope , 1996 .

[15]  Mark A. Lantz,et al.  Atomic-force-microscope study of contact area and friction on NbSe2 , 1997 .

[16]  J. Rice.  A path-independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain , 1968 .

[17]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[18]  L. B. Freund,et al.  Stress intensity factor calculations based on a conservation integral , 1978 .

[19]  James K. Knowles,et al.  On a class of conservation laws in linearized and finite elastostatics , 1972 .

[20]  K. Johnson,et al.  Adhesion and friction between a smooth elastic spherical asperity and a plane surface , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  D. F. Ogletree,et al.  Variation of the Interfacial Shear Strength and Adhesion of a Nanometer-Sized Contact , 1996 .

[22]  K. Johnson.  Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[23]  James R. Rice,et al.  Dislocation Nucleation from a Crack Tip" an Analysis Based on the Peierls Concept , 1991 .

[24]  Patricia McGuiggan,et al.  Fundamental experimental studies in tribology : the transition from interfacial friction of undamaged molecularly smooth surfaces to normal friction with wear , 1990 .

[25]  J. D. Eshelby.  Energy Relations and the Energy-Momentum Tensor in Continuum Mechanics , 1999 .