INTRAPOPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN ANNUAL PLANTS. III. THE CONTRASTING EFFECTS OF INTRA‐ AND INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION

The roles of intraspecific and interspecific competition in producing differentiation within populations of Veronica peregrina were studied in two populations under controlled, greenhouse conditions. In nature, each population spans an environmental gradient across the center and sides of a temporary, vernal pool in California. Individuals at the center are subjected to intense intraspecific competition produced by high densities (to 30 seedlings/cm2) generated by quasi‐simultaneous germination (90% of seeds germinate in one week). Individuals at the periphery are subjected to interspecific competition with grasses, which shade out the Veronica 4–6 weeks after the onset of winter growth.

[1]  J. Groenendael Selection for different life histories in Plantago Lanceolata L. , 1985 .

[2]  L. Gottlieb,et al.  Genetics and Morphological Evolution in Plants , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[3]  R. Bendel,et al.  Assessing competition among skewed distributions of plant biomass: an application of the jackknife , 1984 .

[4]  N. L. Fowler,et al.  The role of germination date, spatial arrangement, and neighbourhood effects in competitive interactions in Linum , 1984 .

[5]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[6]  M. Willson,et al.  Plant reproductive ecology , 1983 .

[7]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[8]  R. Primack,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGICAL GENETICS IN PLANTAGO. VII. REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT IN POPULATIONS OF P. LANCEOLATA L. , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  J. Harding,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR THE EVOLUTION OF COMPETITION BETWEEN TWO SPECIES OF ANNUAL PLANTS , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  S. Guttman,et al.  Environmental Heterogeneity, Genetic Polymorphism, and Reproductive Strategies , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[11]  J. P. Grime Plant strategies in shade , 1981 .

[12]  D. Levin,et al.  The Ecological and Genetic Consequences of Density-Dependent Regulation in Plants , 1980 .

[13]  J. Watson Evolution in a Heterogeneous Environment , 1980 .

[14]  J. Harper,et al.  Contribution to reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits , 1979, Nature.

[15]  M. C. Grant,et al.  BIOLOGY OF ECOLOGICALLY MARGINAL POPULATIONS OF ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM. I. PHENETICS AND DYNAMICS , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  K. Keeler INTRA‐POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN ANNUAL PLANTS. II. ELECTROPHORETIC VARIATION IN VERONICA PEREGRINA , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[18]  J. Endler Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. , 1977, Monographs in population biology.

[19]  John L. Harper,et al.  INTERFERENCE IN DUNE ANNUALS: SPATIAL PATTERN AND NEIGHBOURHOOD EFFECTS , 1977 .

[20]  R. Law,et al.  LIFE‐HISTORY VARIATION IN POA ANNUA , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  R. Snaydon,et al.  Rapid population differentiation in a mosaic environment , 1976, Heredity.

[22]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Polymorphism in Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) Beauv. ex. J. & C. Presl , 1975 .

[23]  Francisco J. Ayala,et al.  Genetic response to environmental heterogeneity , 1974, Nature.

[24]  O. Solbrig,et al.  Components of regulation of a population of dandelions in Michigan. , 1974 .

[25]  Y. Linhart INTRA‐POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN ANNUAL PLANTS I. VERONICA PEREGRINA L. RAISED UNDER NON‐COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS , 1974, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  Esther G. McLaughlin AUTECOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THREE SPECIES OF CALLITRICHE NATIVE IN CALIFORNIA , 1974 .

[27]  C. Baskin,et al.  Plant Population Differences in Dormancy and Germination Characteristics of Seeds: Heredity or Environment? , 1973 .

[28]  I. Baker,et al.  Intra-population Differentiation of Physiological Response to Flooding in a Population of Veronica peregrina L. , 1973, Nature.

[29]  H. G. Baker Seed Weight in Relation to Environmental Conditions in California , 1972 .

[30]  R. Snaydon,et al.  RAPID POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN A MOSAIC ENVIRONMENT. II. MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION IN ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM , 1972, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  R. Allard,et al.  Microgeographical Variation in Allozyme Frequencies in Avena barbata. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  John L. Harper,et al.  OCCUPATION OF BIOLOGICAL SPACE DURING SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT , 1972 .

[33]  A. Bradshaw Some of the Evolutionary Consequences of Being a Plant , 1972 .

[34]  A. Bradshaw,et al.  Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants , 1971 .

[35]  N. Nie,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[36]  J. Harper,et al.  The reproduc-tive strategy of higher plants. 1. The concept of strategy with special reference to Senecio vulgaris L. , 1970 .

[37]  D. Cohen,et al.  Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment when a correlation may exist between the conditions at the time a choice has to be made and the subsequent outcome. , 1967, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  D. Cohen Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  S. Jain,et al.  Evolutionary divergence among adjacent plant populations I. The evidence and its theoretical analysis , 1966, Heredity.

[40]  J. Rowe Environmental Preconditioning, with Special Reference to Forestry , 1964 .

[41]  J. Black Competition between plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) with particular reference to leaf area and the light microclimate , 1958 .

[42]  E. J. Kraus The Reproductive Capacity of Plants , 1943, Ecology.

[43]  D. T.,et al.  The Reproductive Capacity of Plants , 1943, Nature.