Review of free software tools for image analysis of fluorescence cell micrographs

An increasing number of free software tools have been made available for the evaluation of fluorescence cell micrographs. The main users are biologists and related life scientists with no or little knowledge of image processing. In this review, we give an overview of available tools and guidelines about which tools the users should use to segment fluorescence micrographs. We selected 15 free tools and divided them into stand‐alone, Matlab‐based, ImageJ‐based, free demo versions of commercial tools and data sharing tools. The review consists of two parts: First, we developed a criteria catalogue and rated the tools regarding structural requirements, functionality (flexibility, segmentation and image processing filters) and usability (documentation, data management, usability and visualization). Second, we performed an image processing case study with four representative fluorescence micrograph segmentation tasks with figure‐ground and cell separation. The tools display a wide range of functionality and usability. In the image processing case study, we were able to perform figure‐ground separation in all micrographs using mainly thresholding. Cell separation was not possible with most of the tools, because cell separation methods are provided only by a subset of the tools and are difficult to parametrize and to use. Most important is that the usability matches the functionality of a tool. To be usable, specialized tools with less functionality need to fulfill less usability criteria, whereas multipurpose tools need a well‐structured menu and intuitive graphical user interface.

[1]  Ralf Palmisano,et al.  Comparison of parameter‐adapted segmentation methods for fluorescence micrographs , 2011, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[2]  Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin,et al.  ICY: A new open-source community image processing software , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[3]  Thomas M. Deserno,et al.  Evaluation of free non-diagnostic DICOM software tools , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  C. Bakal,et al.  Quantitative Morphological Signatures Define Local Signaling Networks Regulating Cell Morphology , 2007, Science.

[5]  Michael Wagner,et al.  daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. , 2006, Environmental microbiology.

[6]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[7]  Ariel Chernomoretz,et al.  Using Cell‐ID 1.4 with R for Microscope‐Based Cytometry , 2008, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[8]  Stefan Posch,et al.  Scratch Assay Analysis with Topology-Preserving Level Sets and Texture Measures , 2011, IbPRIA.

[9]  Frank B. Dazzo,et al.  CMEIAS Color Segmentation: An Improved Computing Technology to Process Color Images for Quantitative Microbial Ecology Studies at Single-Cell Resolution , 2010, Microbial Ecology.

[10]  Ambuj K. Singh,et al.  Bisque: a platform for bioimage analysis and management , 2009, Bioinform..

[11]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  CMEIAS: A Computer-Aided System for the Image Analysis of Bacterial Morphotypes in Microbial Communities , 2001, Microbial Ecology.

[12]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[13]  Stefan Posch,et al.  A Framework Unifying the Development of Image Analysis Algorithms and Associated User Interfaces , 2013, MVA.

[14]  M. West,et al.  Image segmentation and dynamic lineage analysis in single‐cell fluorescence microscopy , 2009, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[15]  Marco Marcello,et al.  Interactive segmentation of clustered cells via geodesic commute distance and constrained density weighted Nyström method , 2010, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[16]  Andrew Gordon,et al.  Using Cell‐ID 1.4 with R for Microscope‐Based Cytometry , 2008, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[17]  Supporting Online Material for Local Signaling Networks That Regulate Cell Morphology Defined by Quantitative Morphological Signatures , 2007 .

[18]  Harry Hochheiser,et al.  A flexible framework for Web interfaces to image databases: supporting user-defined ontologies and links to external databases , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[19]  M. Wagner,et al.  In situ techniques and digital image analysis methods for quantifying spatial localization patterns of nitrifiers and other microorganisms in biofilm and flocs. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[20]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[21]  Carolina Wählby,et al.  BlobFinder, a tool for fluorescence microscopy image cytometry , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[22]  Tj Collins.  Introduction to ImageJ for Light Microscopy , 2007, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[23]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software , 2011, Bioinform..

[24]  John Miano,et al.  Compressed image file formats , 1999 .

[25]  K. Eliceiri,et al.  Bioimage informatics for experimental biology. , 2009, Annual review of biophysics.

[26]  V. Girish,et al.  Affordable image analysis using NIH Image/ImageJ. , 2004, Indian journal of cancer.

[27]  Tom Fleischer,et al.  Compressed Image File Formats Jpeg Png Gif Xbm Bmp , 2016 .

[28]  Stefan Posch,et al.  Knowing What Happened - Automatic Documentation of Image Analysis Processes , 2011, ICVS.

[29]  Thomas Martin Deserno,et al.  Scale-independent shape analysis for quantitative cytology using mathematical morphology , 2000, Comput. Biol. Medicine.