Power‐law residence time distribution in the hyporheic zone of a 2nd‐order mountain stream

[1] We measured the hyporheic residence time distribution in a 2nd-order mountain stream at the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, and found it to be a power-law over at least 1.5 orders of magnitude in time (1.5 hr to 3.5 d). The residence time distribution has a very long tail which scales as t−1.28, and is poorly characterized by an exponential model. Because of the small power-law exponent, efforts to characterize the mean hyporheic residence time (ts) in this system result in estimates that are scale invariant, increasing with the characteristic advection time within the stream channel (tad). The distribution implies the hyporheic zone has a very large range of exchange timescales, with significant quantities of water and solutes stored over time-scales very much longer than tad. The hyporheic zone in such streams may contribute to short-time fractal scaling in time series of solute concentrations observed in small-watershed studies.

[1]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  1 – Quantifying Hydrologic Interactions between Streams and Their Subsurface Hyporheic Zones , 2000 .

[2]  J. Kirchner,et al.  Catchment-scale advection and dispersion as a mechanism for fractal scaling in stream tracer concentrations , 2001 .

[3]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  Seasonal and Storm Dynamics of the Hyporheic Zone of a 4th-Order Mountain Stream. I: Hydrologic Processes , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[4]  F. Triska,et al.  RETENTION AND TRANSPORT OF NUTRIENTS IN A THIRD-ORDER STREAM IN NORTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA: HYPORHEIC PROCESSES' , 1989 .

[5]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  Floods, channel change, and the hyporheic zone , 1999 .

[6]  Robert L. Runkel,et al.  One-Dimensional Transport with Inflow and Storage (OTIS): A Solute Transport Model for Streams and Rivers , 1998 .

[7]  S. Findlay Importance of surface‐subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: The hyporheic zone , 1995 .

[8]  Ralph E. Showalter,et al.  Diffusion models for fractured media , 1990 .

[9]  F. Swanson,et al.  Seasonal and Storm Dynamics of the Hyporheic Zone of a 4th-Order Mountain Stream. II: Nitrogen Cycling , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[10]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Evaluating the Reliability of the Stream Tracer Approach to Characterize Stream‐Subsurface Water Exchange , 1996 .

[11]  Jeffrey H. Harwell,et al.  Influence of Rhodamine WT Properties on Sorption and Transport in Subsurface Media , 1993 .

[12]  Roy A. Walters,et al.  Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool‐and‐riffle stream: A transient storage model , 1983 .

[13]  J. Harvey,et al.  Characterizing multiple timescales of stream and storage zone interaction that affect solute fate and transport in streams , 2000 .

[14]  Malgorzata Peszynska Finite element approximation of diffusion equations with convolution terms , 1996, Math. Comput..

[15]  Aaron I. Packman,et al.  Erratum: "Effect of flow-induced exchange in hyporheic zones on longitudinal transport of solutes in streams and rivers" (Water Resources Research (2002) 38:1) , 2002 .

[16]  S. Wondzell,et al.  Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams , 2003 .

[17]  J. Kirchner,et al.  Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments , 2000, Nature.

[18]  Ulrich Hornung,et al.  Miscible displacement , 1996 .

[19]  Sean Andrew McKenna,et al.  On the late‐time behavior of tracer test breakthrough curves , 2000 .

[20]  Aaron I. Packman,et al.  Effect of flow‐induced exchange in hyporheic zones on longitudinal transport of solutes in streams and rivers , 2002 .