Capturing the relevant problems leading to pain- and usage-driven innovations: The Dependency Structure Modeling Value Bucket algorithm

The Dependency Structure Modeling Value Bucket tool is integrated into Radical Innovation Design methodology in order to explore the front end of innovation in need seeker mode. The determination of innovation opportunities, here called value buckets, has been automated by matrix representations of dependencies among problems or pain points, usage situations, and existing solutions. Three matrices are built along the problem-setting stage of a Radical Innovation Design process. The first matrix expresses which problems occur during usage scenarios, the second how far existing solutions cover problems, and the third to what degree existing solutions are useful in usage situations. Combining these three matrices results in a matrix of value buckets, which represents the combinations of important problems which occur during characteristic usage situations and for which few existing solutions are useful or efficient. This outcome allows focused creativity workshops to be run, resulting in usage innovations with a high likelihood of market success.

[1]  Joe Hempen Global Innovation , 2002 .

[2]  Romain Farel,et al.  Usefulness Simulation of Design Concepts , 2015 .

[3]  Romain Farel,et al.  The UNPC innovativeness set of indicators for idea or project selection and maturation in healthcare , 2017 .

[4]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[5]  Marija Jankovic,et al.  Observations From Radical Innovation Projects Considering the Company Context , 2013 .

[6]  M. Schaffernicht Causality and diagrams for system dynamics , 2007 .

[7]  Wei Chen,et al.  Usage Coverage Model for Choice Modeling: Principles , 2009, DAC 2009.

[8]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[9]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Handling Imprecision in Pairwise Comparison , 2002 .

[10]  J. Kohnen,et al.  Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant , 2006 .

[11]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  THE SPECIFICITIES OF RADICAL INNOVATION , 2011 .

[12]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[13]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  A process model for industrial new product development , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  The Virtual Integrated Design Method , 2003 .

[15]  E. Hippel,et al.  The Age of the Consumer-Innovator , 2011 .

[16]  Y. Pigneur,et al.  Business Model Generation , 2010 .

[17]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Choice Modeling for Usage Context-Based Design , 2012 .

[18]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .

[19]  R. Cooper Predevelopment activities determine new product success , 1988 .

[20]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  A usage coverage based approach for assessing product family design Une méthode d'évaluation de la conception d'une famille de produits basée sur le modèle de couverture d'usages , 2012 .

[21]  Paul Millier,et al.  Marketing the Unknown: Developing Market Strategies for Technical Innovations , 1999 .

[22]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: The Revolutionary Book That Will Change the Way You Do Business , 2011 .

[23]  Michael S. Hopkins 8 reasons sustainability will change management (that you never thought of) , 2009 .

[24]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Set-based design by simulation of usage scenario coverage , 2013 .

[25]  T. Saaty,et al.  Ranking by Eigenvector Versus Other Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1998 .

[26]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .