论文信息 - Factors and values of willingness to pay for improved construction waste management--a perspective of Malaysian contractors.

Factors and values of willingness to pay for improved construction waste management--a perspective of Malaysian contractors.

Malaysia is facing an increase in the generation of waste and of accompanying problems with the disposal of this waste. In the last two decades, extensive building and infrastructure development projects have led to an increase in the generation of construction waste material. The construction industry has a substantial impact on the environment, and its environmental effects are in direct relation to the quality and quantity of the waste it generates. This paper discusses general characteristics of the construction contractors, the contractors' willingness to pay (WTP) for improved construction waste management, determining factors which affect the amount of their willingness to pay, and suggestions and policy implications in the perspective of construction waste management in Malaysia. The data in this study is based on contractors registered with the construction industry development board (CIDB) of Malaysia. Employing the open ended contingent valuation method, the study assessed the contractors' average maximum WTP for improved construction waste management to be RM69.88 (1US$=3.6 RM) per tonne of waste. The result shows that the average maximum WTP is higher for large contractors than for medium and small contractors. The highest average maximum WTP value is RM88.00 for Group A (large contractors) RM78.25 for Group B (medium-size contractors) and RM55.80 for Group C (small contractors). One of the contributions of this study is to highlight the difference of CIDB registration grade in the WTP for improved construction waste management. It is found that contractors' WTP for improved waste collection and disposal services increases with the increase in contractors' current paid up capital. The identified factors and determinants of the WTP will assist the formulation of appropriate policies in addressing the construction waste problem in Malaysia and indirectly improve the quality of construction in the country.

[1] Anil Markandya,et al. THE VALUATION OF HEALTH IMPACTS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , 2009 .

[2] Matthew J. Kotchen,et al. Random effects analysis , 2003 .

[3] Arthur J. Caplan,et al. Waste Not or Want Not? A Contingent Ranking Analysis of Curbside Waste Disposal Options , 2002 .

[4] Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[5] David Aadland,et al. Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling with Detection and Mitigation of Hypothetical Bias , 2003 .

[6] Marcello Basili,et al. Analysing demand for environmental quality: a willingness to pay/accept study in the province of Siena (Italy). , 2006, Waste management.

[7] Anni Huhtala,et al. How much do money, inconvenience and pollution matter? Analysing households» demand for large-scale recycling and incineration , 1999 .

[8] Richard C. Bishop,et al. Valuing wildlife in benefit‐cost analyses: A case study involving endangered species , 1987 .

[9] Michael Creel,et al. Semi-Nonparametric Distribution-Free Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[10] M. Giordano,et al. Estimating the demand for municipal waste compost via farmers' willingness-to-pay in Ghana. , 2006, Waste management.

[11] Jamal Othman,et al. Household Preferences for Solid Waste Management in Malaysia , 2003 .

[12] C. Tisdell,et al. The Net Benefit of Saving the Asian Elephant: A Policy and Contingent Valuation Study , 2004 .