Professionalism in Crime Scene Examination: The Seven Key Attributes of Top Crime Scene Examiners

Abstract The crime scene is a critical element of criminal investigations and where forensic science begins. Inadequately managed scenes lead to poor evidence and risk of wrongful convictions. Reports from the United States and the United Kingdom highlight that some crime scene examiners (CSEs) outperform their peers, leading to less unsolved cases. What neither report explained was why some CSEs excel. We identified the attributes of top-performing CSEs using job analytical techniques with 72 police investigators, forensic scientists, senior police managers, and 18 top CSEs from across Australia. We analyzed the data and found seven distinct critical skill sets for top performance in CSE: knowledge, life experience, professionalism, approach to life, communication, cognitive abilities, and stress management. In this paper we present the critical skills and discuss the multiple ways that top CSEs positively impact the work of criminal investigators and other CSEs, as well as the impact they have upon efficiencies within forensic laboratories.

[1]  G. King,et al.  Measuring the Expertise of Paediatric Rehabilitation Therapists , 2008 .

[2]  O. Ribaux,et al.  Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part II: Intelligence and crime scene examination. , 2010, Forensic Science International.

[3]  James Robertson,et al.  Forensic science, an enabler or dis-enabler for criminal investigation? , 2012 .

[4]  J. Stubbs,et al.  Domestic Violence, Separation and Parenting: Negotiating Safety Using Legal Processes , 2003 .

[5]  Richard Adderley,et al.  The Effects of Deprivation on the Time Spent Examining Crime Scenes and the Recovery of DNA and Fingerprints , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  P. Boendermaker,et al.  What are the characteristics of the competent general practitioner trainer? , 2000, Family practice.

[7]  Smith,et al.  The Effective Detective: Identifying the skills of an effective SIO , 2000 .

[8]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Characteristics of effective SIOs : a content analysis for management in police investigations , 2008 .

[9]  Kenneth J. Preiss.  A two-stage process for eliciting and prioritising critical knowledge , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act in Sociology. , 1973 .

[11]  Eric Herrenkohl.  How to Hire A-Players: Finding the Top People for Your Team- Even If You Don't Have a Recruiting Department , 2010 .

[12]  S. Sonnentag.  Identifying High Performers: Do Peer Nominations Suffer from a Likeability Bias? , 1998, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

[13]  J. L. Smith,et al.  Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis , 1995 .

[14]  Frank P. Deane,et al.  On being mindful, emotionally aware, and more resilient: longitudinal pilot study of police recruits , 2010 .

[15]  R. Moles,et al.  Forensic Investigations and Miscarriages of Justice: The Rhetoric Meets the Reality , 2010 .

[16]  R. Folger,et al.  RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE , 1997 .

[17]  John Horswell,et al.  The practice of crime scene investigation , 2004 .

[18]  J. Bohan,et al.  Review of: Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2010 .

[19]  S. Robbins.  Essentials of Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[20]  C. Cassell,et al.  Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .

[21]  Law. Policy.  Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009 .

[22]  K. Seers.  Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[23]  J. Robertson,et al.  “Get it right the first time”: Critical Issues at the Crime Scene , 2012 .