Gestural Timing and Derived Environment Effects in Norwegian Clusters

This paper considers the phonological behavior of /C/ clusters in Urban East Norwegian (henceforth UEN), as recently discussed by Kristoffersen (2000). I will argue that the phonetic realization of such clusters depends on the relative timing of the articulatory gestures associated with // and the following consonant. Specifically, the patterning of /C/ clusters lends further support to Cho's (1998a,b) phonetically-based Optimalitytheoretic (OT) approach to intergestural timing specifications. Cho's central hypothesis is that "the timing between two gestures created by morpheme concatenation is not lexically specified and is therefore potentially subject to any phonological change which can be produced by varying gestural overlap" (Cho 1998b:5). This hypothesis provides a basis for explaining derived environment effects whereby overlap in /C/ sequences is blocked within morphemes but not across morpheme or word boundaries. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 documents the derived environment effects in UEN clusters. Section 3 examines the role of gestural timing in cluster realization. Section 4 develops a phonetically-based analysis of the derived environment effects, which is then compared with two alternative OT accounts in Section 5. Finally, Section 6 concludes by considering some empirical implications of the proposed analysis, with specific reference to liquid assimilation processes observed in the Spanish of Havana, Cuba.

[1]  Laura Walsh Dickey The phonology of liquids , 1997 .

[2]  A. Quilis Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas , 1993 .

[3]  Anthoula Revithiadou,et al.  Headmost Accent Wins , 1999 .

[4]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Articulatory gestures as phonological units , 1989, Phonology.

[5]  J. Harris Autosegmental phonology an dliquid assimilation in Havana Spanish , 1985 .

[6]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Faithfulness and reduplicative identity , 1995 .

[7]  Travis G. Bradley The phonetics and phonology of rhotic duration contrast and neutralization , 2001 .

[8]  Elizabeth C. Zsiga Phonetic alignment constraints: consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[9]  Inger Moen,et al.  Effects of voicing on /t, d/ tongue/palate contact in English and norwegian , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[10]  Donca Steriade,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Gestures and autosegments: comments on Browman and Goldstein's paper , 1990 .

[11]  Kazutaka Kurisu,et al.  The Phonology of Morpheme Realization , 2002 .

[12]  Gjert Kristoffersen,et al.  The phonology of Norwegian , 2000 .

[13]  Dani Byrd,et al.  A Phase Window Framework for Articulatory Timing , 1996, Phonology.

[14]  Manfred Mayrhofer,et al.  A Sanskrit Grammar , 1972 .

[15]  J. Padgett,et al.  Stricture in Feature Geometry , 1995 .

[16]  C. Browman,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech , 1990 .

[17]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[18]  Adamantios I. Gafos,et al.  The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology , 1999 .

[19]  John Alderete,et al.  Derived Environment Effects in OT , 1998 .

[20]  C. Browman,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.

[21]  Scott Meredith,et al.  Book Reviews: Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech , 1992, CL.

[22]  Adamantios I. Gafos,et al.  A Grammar of Gestural Coordination , 2002 .