Regional water footprints of potential biofuel production in China

BackgroundDevelopment of biofuels is considered as one of the important ways to replace conventional fossil energy and mitigate climate change. However, rapid increase of biofuel production could cause other environmental concerns in China such as water stress. This study is intended to evaluate the life-cycle water footprints (WF) of biofuels derived from several potential non-edible feedstocks including cassava, sweet sorghum, and Jatropha curcas in China. Different water footprint types including blue water, green water, and grey water are considered in this study. Based on the estimated WF, water deprivation impact and water stress degree on local water environment are further analyzed for different regions in China.ResultsOn the basis of the feedstock resource availability, sweet sorghum, cassava, and Jatropha curcas seeds are considered as the likely feedstocks for biofuel production in China. The water footprint results show that the feedstock growth is the most water footprint intensive process, while the biofuel conversion and transportation contribute little to total water footprints. Water footprints vary significantly by region with climate and soil variations. The life-cycle water footprints of cassava ethanol, sweet sorghum ethanol, and Jatropha curcas seeds biodiesel were estimated to be 73.9–222.2, 115.9–210.4, and 64.7–182.3 L of water per MJ of biofuel, respectively. Grey water footprint dominates the life-cycle water footprint for each type of the biofuels. Development of biofuels without careful water resource management will exert significant impacts on local water resources. The water resource impacts vary significantly among regions. For example, based on blue and grey water consumption, Gansu province in China will suffer much higher water stress than other regions do due to limited available water resources and large amount of fertilizer use in that province. In term of blue water, Shandong province is shown with the most severe water stress issue, followed by Gansu province, which is attributed to the limited water resources in both provinces.ConclusionsBy considering feedstock resource distribution, biofuel production potentials, and estimated water footprints, this study provides insight into the impact of biofuel production on the local water environment in China. Biofuel development policies need to be carefully designed for the sustainable development of biofuels in China.

[1]  Yungang Wang,et al.  A comprehensive review on densified solid biofuel industry in China , 2016 .

[2]  Gengqiang Pu,et al.  Life cycle economic analysis of fuel ethanol derived from cassava in southwest China , 2003 .

[3]  Qi Yue,et al.  Spatial suitability and its bio-ethanol potential of sweet sorghum in China , 2010 .

[4]  Jay J. Cheng,et al.  Biological potential of microalgae in China for biorefinery-based production of biofuels and high value compounds. , 2015, New biotechnology.

[5]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[6]  Xinxing Pan,et al.  Environmental sustainability of bioethanol produced from sweet sorghum stem on saline-alkali land. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[7]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  “Supply push” or “demand pull?”: Strategic recommendations for the responsible development of biofuel in China , 2015 .

[8]  Winnie Gerbens-Leenes,et al.  The water footprint of sweeteners and bio-ethanol. , 2009, Environment international.

[9]  A. A. A. Kheira,et al.  Response of Jatropha curcas L. to water deficits: Yield, water use efficiency and oilseed characteristics , 2009 .

[10]  Guohao Zhao,et al.  An analysis of Chinese provincial carbon dioxide emission efficiencies based on energy consumption structure , 2016 .

[11]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Life cycle water footprint of hydrogenation-derived renewable diesel production from lignocellulosic biomass. , 2016, Water research.

[12]  Mohammad. Rasul,et al.  Prospect of biofuels as an alternative transport fuel in Australia , 2015 .

[13]  B. Jiménez,et al.  Estimation of the water footprint of sugarcane in Mexico: is ethanol production an environmentally feasible fuel option? , 2014 .

[14]  Thapat Silalertruksa,et al.  Water Footprint and Impact of Water Consumption for Food, Feed, Fuel Crops Production in Thailand , 2014 .

[15]  Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin,et al.  Managing product returns to achieve supply chain sustainability: an exploratory study and research propositions , 2015 .

[16]  Man Kee Lam,et al.  Life cycle assessment for the production of biodiesel: A case study in Malaysia for palm oil versus jatropha oil , 2009 .

[17]  Lars-Peter Lauven,et al.  Determinants of economically optimal cassava-to-ethanol plant capacities with consideration of GHG emissions , 2014 .

[18]  H. Savenije,et al.  The water footprint of bioenergy from Jatropha curcas L. , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  T. Minowa,et al.  Evaluation of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from poly(phenyllactic acid) production using sweet sorghum , 2015 .

[20]  T. Mungcharoen,et al.  Bioethanol water footprint: life cycle optimization for water reduction. , 2015 .

[21]  He Li,et al.  Energy efficiency and potentials of cassava fuel ethanol in Guangxi region of China. , 2006 .

[22]  中華人民共和国国家統計局.  China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[23]  Pomthong Malakul,et al.  Life-cycle energy and environmental analysis of bioethanol production from cassava in Thailand. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[24]  Kritana Prueksakorn,et al.  Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel from Jatropha curcas L. in Thailand. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Mukand S. Babel,et al.  Hydrological impact of biofuel production: A case study of the Khlong Phlo Watershed in Thailand , 2011 .

[26]  Kiyo Kurisu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of conventional and optimised Jatropha biodiesel fuels , 2016 .

[27]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crops products , 2011 .

[28]  Jun Li,et al.  Energy efficiency and environmental performance of bioethanol production from sweet sorghum stem based on life cycle analysis. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[29]  Chiuhsiang Joe Lin,et al.  Water footprint analysis of second-generation bioethanol in Taiwan , 2015 .

[30]  Zhiyuan Hu,et al.  Net energy, CO2 emission, and life-cycle cost assessment of cassava-based ethanol as an alternative automotive fuel in China , 2004 .

[31]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Do biofuels require more water than do fossil fuels? Life cycle-based assessment of jatropha oil production in rural Mozambique , 2013 .

[33]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Process simulation and life cycle analysis of biodiesel production , 2016 .

[34]  J. Bi,et al.  Energy's thirst for water in China. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of bioenergy , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Christoph Herrmann,et al.  Technical applications of Jatropha oil—environmental effectiveness of renewable resources , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[37]  Xiaomin Xie,et al.  Life cycle water footprints of nonfood biomass fuels in China. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  M. Aldaya,et al.  The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard , 2011 .

[39]  Ying Lu,et al.  Lifecycle assessment of the economic, environmental and energy performance of Jatropha curcas L. biodiesel in China , 2011 .

[40]  Tianzhu Zhang,et al.  Unintended consequences of bioethanol feedstock choice in China. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[41]  Wouter Achten,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Jatropha biodiesel as transportation fuel in rural India , 2010 .

[42]  Jin Yong,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Resource and Energy Consumption for Production of Biodiesel , 2010 .

[43]  Gengqiang Pu,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of cassava-based fuel ethanol used as an alternative automotive fuel in Guangxi, China , 2006 .

[44]  P. Alvarez,et al.  The water footprint of biofuels: a drink or drive issue? , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[45]  Xinhui Han,et al.  Current Status and Future Potential of Energy Derived from Chinese Agricultural Land: A Review , 2015, BioMed research international.

[46]  Yi-Wen Chiu,et al.  Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  Pomthong Malakul,et al.  Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Analysis Study of a Model Biorefinery in Thailand , 2013 .

[48]  Thapat Silalertruksa,et al.  Implications of the biofuels policy mandate in Thailand on water: the case of bioethanol. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[49]  Liu Lei,et al.  Assessments of suitability, energy capacity and environment impact on biodiesel from Jatropha curcas L , 2012 .

[50]  Prasert Pavasant,et al.  Water Footprints of Cassava- and Molasses-Based Ethanol Production in Thailand , 2013, Natural Resources Research.

[51]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Biofuel scenarios in a water perspective: the global blue and green water footprint of road transport in 2030 , 2012 .

[52]  Guftaar Ahmad Sardar Sidhu,et al.  A comparative review of China, India and Pakistan renewable energy sectors and sharing opportunities , 2016 .

[53]  Yi-Wen Chiu,et al.  Quantifying the regional water footprint of biofuel production by incorporating hydrologic modeling , 2012 .

[54]  Xiangzheng Deng,et al.  Potential land for plantation of Jatropha curcas as feedstocks for biodiesel in China , 2010 .

[55]  O. Adeoti,et al.  Water use impact of ethanol at a gasoline substitution ratio of 5% from cassava in Nigeria. , 2010 .

[56]  Li Yulong,et al.  Review of renewable energy investment and financing in China: Status, mode, issues and countermeasures , 2014 .

[57]  Mei-Hui Su,et al.  Water footprint analysis of bioethanol energy crops in Taiwan , 2015 .

[58]  W. H. Maes,et al.  Use of inadequate data and methodological errors lead to an overestimation of the water footprint of Jatropha curcas , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Cristina Trois,et al.  The potential of cassava biomass and applicable technologies for sustainable biogas production in South Africa: A review , 2014 .

[60]  De-hua Liu,et al.  Biodiesel from conventional feedstocks. , 2012, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[61]  P. Alvarez,et al.  Opinion: The water footprint of biofuel production in the USA , 2010 .

[62]  Xin-gang Zhao,et al.  Focus on bioenergy industry development and energy security in China , 2014 .

[63]  Weiping Song,et al.  Bioenergy and biofuels: History, status, and perspective , 2015 .

[64]  R. Bailis,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions and land use change from Jatropha curcas-based jet fuel in Brazil. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[65]  Guang Hui Xie,et al.  Biomass yield and changes in chemical composition of sweet sorghum cultivars grown for biofuel. , 2009 .

[66]  Fangwei Wu,et al.  Potential production of non-food biofuels in China , 2016 .

[67]  Yi-Wen Chiu,et al.  Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[68]  F. Bux,et al.  Biodiesel from microalgae: A critical evaluation from laboratory to large scale production , 2013 .

[69]  Salvatore L. Cosentino,et al.  Agronomic, energetic and environmental aspects of biomass energy crops suitable for Italian environments. , 2008 .

[70]  Dong Jiang,et al.  Assessment of the biomass energy potentials and environmental benefits of Jatropha curcas L. in Southwest China , 2013 .

[71]  Shi Li,et al.  Status, challenges and countermeasures of demand-side management development in China , 2015 .