Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles

Visual attention can be focused concurrently on two stimuli at noncontiguous locations while intermediate stimuli remain ignored. Nevertheless, behavioral performance in multifocal attention tasks falters when attended stimuli fall within one visual hemifield as opposed to when they are distributed across left and right hemifields. This “different-hemifield advantage” has been ascribed to largely independent processing capacities of each cerebral hemisphere in early visual cortices. Here, we investigated how this advantage influences the sustained division of spatial attention. We presented six isoeccentric light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in the lower visual field, each flickering at a different frequency. Participants attended to two LEDs that were spatially separated by an intermediate LED and responded to synchronous events at to-be-attended LEDs. Task-relevant pairs of LEDs were either located in the same hemifield (“within-hemifield” conditions) or separated by the vertical meridian (“across-hemifield” conditions). Flicker-driven brain oscillations, steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), indexed the allocation of attention to individual LEDs. Both behavioral performance and SSVEPs indicated enhanced processing of attended LED pairs during “across-hemifield” relative to “within-hemifield” conditions. Moreover, SSVEPs demonstrated effective filtering of intermediate stimuli in “across-hemifield” condition only. Thus, despite identical physical distances between LEDs of attended pairs, the spatial profiles of gain effects differed profoundly between “across-hemifield” and “within-hemifield” conditions. These findings corroborate that early cortical visual processing stages rely on hemisphere-specific processing capacities and highlight their limiting role in the concurrent allocation of visual attention to multiple locations.

[1]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[2]  Satoshi Shioiri,et al.  Asymmetrical brain activity induced by voluntary spatial attention depends on the visual hemifield: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  fMRI reveals greater within‐ than between‐hemifield integration in the human lateral occipital cortex , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Prediction processes during multiple object tracking (MOT): involvement of dorsal and ventral premotor cortices , 2013, Brain and behavior.

[5]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady‐state visual evoked potential , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[6]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Spatial neglect and attention networks. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[8]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[9]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Competitive Interactions of Attentional Resources in Early Visual Cortex during Sustained Visuospatial Attention within or between Visual Hemifields: Evidence for the Different-hemifield Advantage , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attention gating in short-term visual memory. , 1986, Psychological review.

[12]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Tracking the allocation of attention in visual scenes with steady-state evoked potentials , 2011 .

[13]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Attentional interference at small spatial separations , 1999, Vision Research.

[14]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[15]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Francesco Di Russo,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(01)00134-1 , 2001 .

[17]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Spatial Attention Modulates Center-Surround Interactions in Macaque Visual Area V4 , 2009, Neuron.

[18]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  The spatial profile of the focus of attention in visual search: Insights from MEG recordings , 2010, Vision Research.

[19]  J. Serences,et al.  Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Somers,et al.  Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[21]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[22]  Mark M Schira,et al.  Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  J. Juola,et al.  Evidence for Distinct Attentional Bottlenecks in Attention Switching and Attentional Blink Tasks , 2000, The Journal of general psychology.

[28]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Keeping focused: Sustained spatial selective visual attention is maintained in healthy old age , 2012, Brain Research.

[29]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Sensory Gain Outperforms Efficient Readout Mechanisms in Predicting Attention-Related Improvements in Behavior , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  S. Brandt,et al.  Hemifield effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Attentional bias of competitive interactions in neuronal networks of early visual processing in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[32]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[33]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[34]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[36]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Competitive effects on steady-state visual evoked potentials with frequencies in- and outside the alpha band , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Sustained Multifocal Attentional Enhancement of Stimulus Processing in Early Visual Areas Predicts Tracking Performance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[41]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[42]  Thomas C. Sprague,et al.  Changing the Spatial Scope of Attention Alters Patterns of Neural Gain in Human Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Within-Hemifield Competition in Early Visual Areas Limits the Ability to Track Multiple Objects with Attention , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Can the Spotlight of Attention Be Shaped Like a Doughnut? Evidence From Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2002 .

[45]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Independent effects of attentional gain control and competitive interactions on visual stimulus processing. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  S. Brandt,et al.  What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared , 2007, Brain Research.

[47]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[48]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Surround Attenuation and Distractor Competition in Visual Search , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Scott O Murray,et al.  The effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex are stimulus independent. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[50]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[51]  Giedrius T Buracas,et al.  The Effect of Spatial Attention on Contrast Response Functions in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution , 2005, Vision Research.

[53]  Notger G. Müller,et al.  The attentional ‘spotlight's’ penumbra: center-surround modulation in striate cortex , 2004, Neuroreport.

[54]  Jason M. Scimeca,et al.  Tracking Multiple Objects Is Limited Only by Object Spacing, Not by Speed, Time, or Capacity , 2010, Psychological science.

[55]  R. Dolan,et al.  Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  The center-surround profile of the focus of attention arises from recurrent processing in visual cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  D. Heeger,et al.  When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[59]  P. De Weerd,et al.  Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: the jury is still out. , 2010, Psychological review.

[60]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Selective Attention to Task-Irrelevant Emotional Distractors Is Unaffected by the Perceptual Load Associated with a Foreground Task , 2012, PloS one.

[61]  D. Heeger,et al.  Attentional Enhancement via Selection and Pooling of Early Sensory Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2011, Neuron.

[62]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[64]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  D. Somers,et al.  Processing Efficiency of Divided Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.