Optical Verification of Microbubble Response to Acoustic Radiation Force in Large Vessels With In Vivo Results

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to optically verify the dynamic behaviors of adherent microbubbles in large blood vessel environments in response to a new ultrasound technique using modulated acoustic radiation force. Materials and MethodsPolydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) flow channels coated with streptavidin were used in targeted groups to mimic large blood vessels. The custom-modulated acoustic radiation force beam sequence was programmed on a Verasonics research scanner. In vitro experiments were performed by injecting a biotinylated lipid-perfluorobutane microbubble dispersion through flow channels. The dynamic response of adherent microbubbles was detected acoustically and simultaneously visualized using a video camera connected to a microscope. In vivo verification was performed in a large abdominal blood vessel of a murine model for inflammation with injection of biotinylated microbubbles conjugated with P-selectin antibody. ResultsAggregates of adherent microbubbles were observed optically under the influence of acoustic radiation force. Large microbubble aggregates were observed solely in control groups without targeted adhesion. Additionally, the dispersion of microbubble aggregates were demonstrated to lead to a transient acoustic signal enhancement in control groups (a new phenomenon we refer to as “control peak”). In agreement with in vitro results, the control peak phenomenon was observed in vivo in a murine model. ConclusionsThis study provides the first optical observation of microbubble-binding dynamics in large blood vessel environments with application of a modulated acoustic radiation force beam sequence. With targeted adhesion, secondary radiation forces were unable to produce large aggregates of adherent microbubbles. Additionally, the new phenomenon called control peak was observed both in vitro and in vivo in a murine model for the first time. The findings in this study provide us with a better understanding of microbubble behaviors in large blood vessel environments with application of acoustic radiation force and could potentially guide future beam sequence designs or signal processing routines for enhanced ultrasound molecular imaging.

[1]  J. Hossack,et al.  Ultrasound quantification of molecular marker concentration in large blood vessels , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[2]  J. Hossack,et al.  Binding dynamics of targeted microbubbles in response to modulated acoustic radiation force , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  L. Tian,et al.  Detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice by ultrasound imaging of thymocyte differentiation antigen 1. , 2013, Gastroenterology.

[4]  P. Dayton,et al.  In Vivo Demonstration of Cancer Molecular Imaging with Ultrasound Radiation Force and Buried-Ligand Microbubbles , 2013, Molecular imaging.

[5]  J. Hossack,et al.  Shear Forces from Flow Are Responsible for a Distinct Statistical Signature of Adherent Microbubbles in Large Vessels , 2013, Molecular imaging.

[6]  K. Sharma,et al.  In vivo validation and 3D visualization of broadband ultrasound molecular imaging. , 2013, American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

[7]  J. Willmann,et al.  Molecular imaging of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease with a clinically translatable dual-selectin-targeted US contrast agent: comparison with FDG PET/CT in a mouse model. , 2013, Radiology.

[8]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Earlier detection of breast cancer with ultrasound molecular imaging in a transgenic mouse model. , 2013, Cancer research.

[9]  J. Hossack,et al.  Production rate and diameter analysis of spherical monodisperse microbubbles from two-dimensional, expanding-nozzle flow-focusing microfluidic devices. , 2013, Biomicrofluidics.

[10]  Michael J. Davis,et al.  Carotid inflammation is unaltered by exercise in hypercholesterolemic Swine. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  John A Hossack,et al.  Real-time targeted molecular imaging using singular value spectra properties to isolate the adherent microbubble signal , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  J. Willmann,et al.  Fast microbubble dwell-time based ultrasonic molecular imaging approach for quantification and monitoring of angiogenesis in cancer. , 2012, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[13]  L. Tian,et al.  Quantitative assessment of tumor angiogenesis using real-time motion-compensated contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging , 2012, Angiogenesis.

[14]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  An in vivo validation of the application of acoustic radiation force to enhance the diagnostic utility of molecular imaging using 3-d ultrasound. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Jakub Toczek,et al.  Nanobody-coupled microbubbles as novel molecular tracer. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[16]  K. Ferrara,et al.  Leveraging the power of ultrasound for therapeutic design and optimization. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[17]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[18]  John A Hossack,et al.  Real-Time Technique for Improving Molecular Imaging and Guiding Drug Delivery in Large Blood Vessels: In Vitro and Ex Vivo Results , 2011, Molecular imaging.

[19]  John A. Hossack,et al.  The Singular Value Filter: A General Filter Design Strategy for PCA-Based Signal Separation in Medical Ultrasound Imaging , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Molecular and functional ultrasound imaging in differently aggressive breast cancer xenografts using two novel ultrasound contrast agents (BR55 and BR38) , 2011, European Radiology.

[21]  M. Fujimiya,et al.  Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for qualitative imaging of atherosclerosis in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits: initial experimental study , 2010, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[22]  D. Beyersdorff,et al.  Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2-Specific Microbubbles for Molecular Ultrasound Detection of Prostate Cancer in a Rat Model , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[23]  J. Willmann,et al.  Molecular ultrasound imaging: current status and future directions. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[24]  Isabelle Tardy,et al.  BR55: A Lipopeptide-Based VEGFR2-Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Agent for Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[25]  Koen D Reesink,et al.  Critical appraisal of targeted ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging in large arteries. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  S. Bunting,et al.  Molecular Imaging of the Initial Inflammatory Response in Atherosclerosis: Implications for Early Detection of Disease , 2010, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[27]  K. Ley,et al.  Dual targeting improves microbubble contrast agent adhesion to VCAM-1 and P-selectin under flow. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[28]  John A Hossack,et al.  Dual frequency method for simultaneous translation and real-time imaging of ultrasound contrast agents within large blood vessels. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  F. Foster,et al.  A method for differentiating targeted microbubbles in real time using subharmonic micro-ultrasound and interframe filtering. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[30]  R. Bekeredjian,et al.  Ultrasonic gene and drug delivery to the cardiovascular system. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[31]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  US imaging of tumor angiogenesis with microbubbles targeted to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 in mice. , 2008, Radiology.

[32]  A. Klibanov.  Ultrasound molecular imaging with targeted microbubble contrast agents , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[33]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[34]  J. Lindner,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Inflammation in Atherosclerosis With Targeted Ultrasound Detection of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2007, Circulation.

[35]  John A Hossack,et al.  Enhanced targeting of ultrasound contrast agents using acoustic radiation force. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[36]  K W Ferrara,et al.  Selective imaging of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  D. Beebe,et al.  PDMS bonding by means of a portable, low-cost corona system. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[38]  S. Acton,et al.  Targeted ultrasound contrast agent for molecular imaging of inflammation in high-shear flow. , 2006, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[39]  J. Hossack,et al.  Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[40]  Nico de Jong,et al.  High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[41]  P. Phillips,et al.  Contrast–agent detection and quantification , 2004, European radiology.

[42]  Susannah H Bloch,et al.  Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging , 2004, Molecular imaging.

[43]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[44]  William R. Wagner,et al.  Modulating Targeted Adhesion of an Ultrasound Contrast Agent to Dysfunctional Endothelium , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  P. Ridker,et al.  Novel clinical markers of vascular wall inflammation. , 2001, Circulation research.

[46]  K. Ley,et al.  Ultrasound Assessment of Inflammation and Renal Tissue Injury With Microbubbles Targeted to P-Selectin , 2001, Circulation.

[47]  P. Phillips,et al.  Contrast pulse sequences (CPS): imaging nonlinear microbubbles , 2001, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263).

[48]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive Ultrasound Imaging of Inflammation Using Microbubbles Targeted to Activated Leukocytes , 2000, Circulation.

[49]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[50]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[51]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  Microbubbles targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 bind to activated coronary artery endothelial cells. , 1998, Circulation.

[52]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[53]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[54]  J. Hossack,et al.  Ultrasound-based measurement of molecular marker concentration in large blood vessels: a feasibility study. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.