A new paradigm for low-power, variation-tolerant circuit synthesis using critical path isolation

Design considerations for robustness with respect to variations and low power operations typically impose contradictory design requirements. Low power design techniques such as voltage scaling, dual-Vth etc. can have a large negative impact on parametric yield. In this paper, we propose a novel paradigm for low-power variationtolerant circuit design, which allows aggressive voltage scaling. The principal idea is to (a) isolate and predict the set of possible paths that may become critical under process variations, (b) ensure that they are activated rarely, and (c) avoid possible delay failures in the critical paths by dynamically switching to two-cycle operation (assuming all standard operations are single cycle), when they are activated. This allows us to operate the circuit at reduced supply voltage while achieving the required yield. Simulation results on a set of benchmark circuits at 70nm process technology show average power reduction of 60% with less than 10% performance overhead and 18% overhead in die-area compared to conventional synthesis. Application of the proposed methodology to pipelined design is also investigated.

[1]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  Novel sizing algorithm for yield improvement under process variation in nanometer technology , 2004, Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004..

[2]  Sudhakar M. Reddy,et al.  Design of robustly testable combinational logic circuits , 1991, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[3]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  A novel synthesis approach for active leakage power reduction using dynamic supply gating , 2005, Proceedings. 42nd Design Automation Conference, 2005..

[4]  Luciano Lavagno,et al.  Timed Shannon Circuits: A Power-Efficient Design Style and Synthesis Tool , 1995, 32nd Design Automation Conference.

[5]  David Blaauw,et al.  Statistical optimization of leakage power considering process variations using dual-Vth and sizing , 2004, Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004..

[6]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Digital Integrated Circuits , 2003 .

[7]  D. J. Hathaway,et al.  Uncertainty-aware circuit optimization , 2002, Proceedings 2002 Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.02CH37324).

[8]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  Statistical timing analysis using levelized covariance propagation , 2005, Design, Automation and Test in Europe.

[9]  Vivek De,et al.  Design and reliability challenges in nanometer technologies , 2004, Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004..

[10]  Trevor Mudge,et al.  Razor: a low-power pipeline based on circuit-level timing speculation , 2003, Proceedings. 36th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 2003. MICRO-36..