Detecting gaps with and without attention: Further evidence for attentional receptive fields

In four experiments participants were instructed to detect and localise a gap on a small vertical line. When the line was presented at the periphery, inattention produced a tendency to report broken lines as solid ones and also produced a substantial increase in coarse localisation errors. The results support the hypothesis (Tsal & Shalev, 1996) that the unattended visual field is composed of large attentional receptive fields (ARFs) within which there is no spatial resolution. A partial stimulation of such an ARF, by the broken line's inner ends producing the gap, signals the activation of the entire ARF resulting in the perceptual closure of the gap.

[1]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Y Tsal,et al.  Effects of attention on localization of stimuli in the visual field , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Y Tsal,et al.  Inattention magnifies perceived length: the attentional receptive field hypothesis. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  S Yantis,et al.  Allocating visual attention: tests of a two-process model. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  R. Desimone,et al.  Attentional control of visual perception: cortical and subcortical mechanisms. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[7]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  G. Humphreys,et al.  BIASED ATTENTIONAL SHIFTS ASSOCIATED WITH UNILATERAL LEFT NEGLECT , 2000, Cognitive Neuropsychology.

[10]  J H Maunsell,et al.  The Brain's Visual World: Representation of Visual Targets in Cerebral Cortex , 1995, Science.

[11]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[12]  B. Keysar,et al.  Functional theory of illusory conjunctions and neon colors. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  J Miller,et al.  Attentional effects on concurrent psychophysical discriminations: Investigations of a sample-size model , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  R. Ivry,et al.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Yehoshua Tsal,et al.  Towards a resolution theory of visual attention. , 1995 .

[16]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[17]  A. Bonnel,et al.  Early Modulation of Visual Input: A Study of Attentional Strategies , 1987, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[19]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.