Contemporary Mathematics Adaptive Finite Element Methods in Flow Computations

This article surveys recent developments of theory-based methods for mesh adaptivity and error control in the numerical solution of flow problems. The emphasis is on viscous incompressible flows governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. But also inviscid transsonic flows and viscous lowMach number flows including chemical reactions are considered. The Galerkin finite element method provides the basis for a common rigorous a posteriori error analysis. A large part of the existing work on a posteriori error analysis deals with error estimation in global norms such as the ‘energy norm’ involving usually unknown stability constants. However, in most CFD applications, the error in a global norm does not provide useful bounds for the errors in the quantities of real physical interest. Such ‘goal-oriented’ error bounds can be derived by duality arguments borrowed from optimal control theory. These a posteriori error estimates provide the basis of a feedback process for successively constructing economical meshes and corresponding error bounds tailored to the particular goal of the computation. This approach, called the ’dualweighted-residual method’ (DWR method), is developed within an abstract functional analytic setting, thus providing the general guideline for applications to various kinds of flow models including also aspects of flow control and hydrodynamic stability. Several examples are discussed in order to illustrate the main features of the DWR method.

[1]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for the compressible Euler equations , 2002 .

[2]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Goal-Oriented A Posteriori Error Estimation for Multiple Target Functionals , 2003 .

[3]  T. Richter,et al.  SOLUTIONS OF 3D NAVIER-STOKES BENCHMARK PROBLEMS WITH ADAPTIVE FINITE ELEMENTS , 2006 .

[4]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  Numerical simulation of laminar flames at low Mach number by adaptive finite elements , 1999 .

[5]  R. Rannacher,et al.  Benchmark Computations of Laminar Flow Around a Cylinder , 1996 .

[6]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  A new approach to computational turbulence modeling , 2006 .

[7]  Kenneth Eriksson,et al.  Adaptive finite element methods for parabolic problems IV: nonlinear problems , 1995 .

[8]  Anthony T. Patera,et al.  A hierarchical duality approach to bounds for the outputs of partial differential equations , 1998 .

[9]  Claes Johnson,et al.  Adaptive finite element methods for diffusion and convection problems , 1990 .

[10]  Sergey Korotov,et al.  A posteriori error estimation of goal-oriented quantities by the superconvergence patch recovery , 2003, J. Num. Math..

[11]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  Adaptive finite element methods for low-mach-number flows with chemical reactions , 1999 .

[12]  Serge Prudhomme,et al.  On goal-oriented error estimation for elliptic problems: application to the control of pointwise errors , 1999 .

[13]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Adaptive Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Methods with Interior Penalty for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 2004 .

[14]  Roland Becker,et al.  Solution of a stationary benchmark problem for natural convection with large temperature difference , 2002 .

[15]  M. Giles,et al.  Adjoint methods for PDEs: a posteriori error analysis and postprocessing by duality , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[16]  Vincent Heuveline,et al.  On higher‐order mixed FEM for low Mach number flows: application to a natural convection benchmark problem , 2003 .

[17]  Anthony T. Patera,et al.  A posteriori finite-element output bounds for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations: application to a natural convection problem , 2001 .

[18]  R. RannacherInstitut,et al.  Weighted a Posteriori Error Control in Fe Methods , 1995 .

[19]  M. Giles,et al.  Adjoint Error Correction for Integral Outputs , 2003 .

[20]  J. Oden,et al.  An a posteriori error estimate for finite element approximations of the Navier-Stokes equations , 1994 .

[21]  L. R. Scott,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods , 1994 .

[22]  F. Thomasset Finite element methods for Navier-Stokes equations , 1980 .

[23]  J. Oden,et al.  A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis , 2000 .

[24]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  Detailed Numerical Simulations in Flow Reactors: A New Approach in Measuring Absolute Rate Constants , 1996 .

[25]  Endre Süli,et al.  Adaptive error control for finite element approximations of the lift and drag coefficients in viscous flow , 1997 .

[26]  Roland Becker,et al.  Mesh Adaptation for Stationary Flow Control , 2001 .

[27]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  Fast and reliable solution of the Navier–Stokes equations including chemistry , 1999 .

[28]  Endre Süli,et al.  Adaptive finite element methods for differential equations , 2003, Lectures in mathematics.

[29]  Rüdiger Verführt,et al.  A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh-refinement techniques , 1996, Advances in numerical mathematics.

[30]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  Fundamental directions in mathematical fluid mechanics , 2000 .

[31]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  ARTIFICIAL BOUNDARIES AND FLUX AND PRESSURE CONDITIONS FOR THE INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS , 1996 .

[32]  Kenneth Eriksson,et al.  Adaptive finite element methods for parabolic problems V: long-time integration , 1995 .

[33]  Claes Johnson,et al.  Introduction to Adaptive Methods for Differential Equations , 1995, Acta Numerica.

[34]  T. Hughes,et al.  Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[35]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  An optimal control approach to adaptivity in computational fluid mechanics , 2002 .