Benign and Malignant Skin Lesion Classification Comparison for Three Deep-Learning Architectures

Early detection of melanoma, which is a deadly form of skin cancer, is vital for patients. Differential diagnosis of malignant and benign melanoma is a challenging task even for specialist dermatologists. The diagnostic performance of melanoma has significantly improved with the use of images obtained via dermoscopy devices. With the recent advances in medical image processing field, it is possible to improve the dermatological diagnostic performance by using computer-assisted diagnostic systems. For this purpose, various machine learning algorithms are designed and tested to be used in the diagnosis of melanoma. Deep learning models, which have gained popularity in recent years, have been effective in solving image recognition and classification problems. Concurrently with these developments, studies on the classification of dermoscopic images using CNN models are being performed. In this study, the performance of AlexNet, GoogLeNet and Resnet50 CNNs were examined for the classification problem of benign and malignant melanoma cancers on dermoscopic images. Dermoscopic images of 19373 benign and 2197 malignant lesions obtained from ISIC database were used in the experiments. All three CNNs, which were the former winners of the ImageNet competition, have been reconfigured to perform binary classification. In the experiments 80% of the images were used for training and the remaining 20% were used for validation. All experiments were performed with the same parameters for each CNN models. According to the experiments ResNET50 model achieved the best performance with 92.81% classification accuracy and AlexNet was first-ranked in terms of the time complexity measurements. The development of new models based on existing CNN models with a focus on dermoscopic images will be the subject of future studies.

[1]  E. Topol,et al.  A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, The Lancet. Digital health.

[2]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[3]  J. English,et al.  Teledermatology: A Review and Update , 2018, American Journal of Clinical Dermatology.

[4]  Ravikant Samatham,et al.  Melanoma Early Detection: Big Data, Bigger Picture. , 2019, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[5]  Diana Harcourt,et al.  Patients' experience of the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  D. Rigel,et al.  The Evolution of Melanoma Diagnosis: 25 Years Beyond the ABCDs , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  H. Haenssle,et al.  Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  E. Errichetti,et al.  Dermoscopy in General Dermatology: A Practical Overview , 2016, Dermatology and Therapy.

[9]  H. Kittler,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. , 2002, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  A. Enk,et al.  Deep learning outperformed 11 pathologists in the classification of histopathological melanoma images. , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[11]  Ashfaq A Marghoob,et al.  The complexity of diagnosing melanoma. , 2009, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[12]  Tim Holland-Letz,et al.  Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification. , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[13]  Charles Thomas Darragh,et al.  Melanoma In Situ , 2018 .

[14]  John Paoli,et al.  Accuracy of dermatoscopy for the diagnosis of nonpigmented cancers of the skin , 2017, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[15]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[16]  Nathalie Mie Suzuki,et al.  Histologic review of melanomas by pathologists trained in melanocytic lesions may change therapeutic approach in up to 41.9% of cases* , 2018, Anais brasileiros de dermatologia.

[17]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2019 , 2019, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[18]  Ken Kobayashi,et al.  Accuracy in melanoma detection: a 10-year multicenter survey. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[19]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[20]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[21]  Kathy Dallest,et al.  Teledermatology for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review , 2017, JAMA dermatology.