Abstract Plants and animal cells are naturally occurring actuators that exhibit force and motion driven by fluid transport through the cell membrane. The protein transporters embedded in the cell membrane serve as the selective gateway for ion and fluid transport. The actuator presented in this work generates force and motion from mass transport through an artificial membrane with protein transporters extracted from plant cell membranes. The artificial membrane is formed from purified 1-Palmitoyl-2-Oleoyl-sn-Glycero-3-[Phospho- l -Serine] (Sodium Salt) (POPS), 1-Palmitoyl-2-Oleoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphoethanolamine (POPE) lipids and supported on a porous substrate. The protein transporter used in the actuator membrane is a proton–sucrose cotransporter, SUT4, extracted from yeast cells genetically modified to grow the cotransporter in their cell membranes. The SUT4 transporter conducts proton and sucrose from the side of the membrane with higher concentration and carries water molecules across the membrane. It is observed from transport characterization experiments that fluid flux through the membrane varies with the applied sucrose concentration and hence is chosen as the control stimulus in the actuator. A modified four-state facilitated diffusion model is applied to the transport characterization data to compute the two characteristic parameters for fluid transport, saturation concentration and translocation rate, through the membrane. The flux rate through the membrane is observed to increase with the concentration until a particular value and saturates at a higher concentration. The saturation concentration for the actuator is experimentally found to be 6 ± 0.6 mM sucrose on the side with lower pH. The corresponding maximum translocation rate is found to be 8.5 ± 1.2 nl/ μ g cm2 min. The maximum steady state deformation measured on the actuator is 60 μ m for 30 mM sucrose that corresponds to a force of 0.89 mN.
[1]
W. Frommer,et al.
A New Subfamily of Sucrose Transporters, SUT4, with Low Affinity/High Capacity Localized in Enucleate Sieve Elements of Plants
,
2000,
Plant Cell.
[2]
Donald J. Leo,et al.
Experimental Investigation for Chemo-Mechanical Actuation Using Biological Transport Mechanisms
,
2005
.
[3]
Donald J. Leo,et al.
Biological transport processes for microhydraulic actuation
,
2007
.
[4]
L. Mahadevan,et al.
How the Venus flytrap snaps
,
2005,
Nature.
[5]
T. Sibaoka,et al.
Physiology of Rapid Movements in Higher Plants
,
1969
.
[6]
William H. Brown,et al.
THE MECHANISM OF MOVEMENT AND THE DURATION OF THE EFFECT OF STIMULATION IN THE LEAVES OF DIONAEA
,
1916
.
[7]
Gian Paolo Beretta,et al.
Thermodynamics: Foundations and Applications
,
1991
.
[8]
W. R. Lieb,et al.
Carrier and non-carrier models for sugar transport in the human red blood cell.
,
1972,
Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[9]
B. S. Hill,et al.
The power of movement in plants: the role of osmotic machines
,
1981,
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.
[10]
R. Morillon,et al.
Rapid movements of plants organs require solute-water cotransporters or contractile proteins.
,
2001,
Plant physiology.
[11]
A. Bennett,et al.
Leaf Closure in the Venus Flytrap: An Acid Growth Response
,
1982,
Science.
[12]
Laurson Philip Gustave.
Mechanics Of Materials-ii
,
1938
.
[13]
B. Stevens,et al.
Thermodynamics of symport and antiport catalyzed by cloned or native transporters.
,
1994,
The Journal of experimental biology.
[14]
L. Onsager.
Reciprocal Relations in Irreversible Processes. II.
,
1931
.
[15]
A. Katchalsky,et al.
A Physical Interpretation of the Phenomenological Coefficients of Membrane Permeability
,
1961,
The Journal of general physiology.