‘Untold’ doctoral stories: can we move beyond cultural narratives of neglect?

This article examines the stories of 24 social sciences doctoral students in three universities, one in Canada and two in the UK, who experienced challenging roads to completion. While their stories confirm earlier findings, they also provide insight into how students' agency and personal networks of relationships may be critical, both as resources and constraints. We argue that these ‘untold stories’ of student agency coupled with supervisor narratives of students ‘not measuring up’ can contribute to a culture of institutional neglect. Pedagogies emphasizing an ethic of care and relational rather than regulatory practices are essential if these conditions are to change.

[1]  C. Bond,et al.  Becoming an academic: international perspectives , 2011 .

[2]  L. McAlpine.  Fixed‐term researchers in the social sciences: passionate investment, yet marginalizing experiences , 2010 .

[3]  Nick Hopwood,et al.  A sociocultural view of doctoral students' relationships and agency , 2010 .

[4]  L. McAlpine,et al.  Identity and agency: pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey , 2009 .

[5]  L. McAlpine,et al.  Doctoral student experience in Education:Activities and difficulties influencing identity development , 2009 .

[6]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  Conceptualizing Success in Doctoral Education: Perspectives of Faculty in Seven Disciplines , 2009 .

[7]  Linley Lord,et al.  Peer to peer support: the disappearing work in the doctoral student experience , 2009 .

[8]  Ann E. Austin,et al.  The Role of Doctoral Advisors: A Look at Advising from the Advisor’s Perspective , 2009 .

[9]  V. Sweitzer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Doctoral Student Professional Identity Development: A Developmental Networks Approach , 2008 .

[10]  Susan K. Gardner.  Fitting the Mold of Graduate School: A Qualitative Study of Socialization in Doctoral Education , 2008 .

[11]  C. Colbeck.  Professional identity development theory and doctoral education , 2008 .

[12]  Kelly Michele Marshall,et al.  Innovation in PhD completion: the hardy shall succeed (and be happy!) , 2008 .

[13]  John D. Bain,et al.  Orientations to research higher degree supervision , 2007 .

[14]  Jeffery P. Bieber,et al.  Conceptualizing the Academic Life: Graduate Students' Perspectives , 2006 .

[15]  Pat Thomson,et al.  Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for supervision , 2006 .

[16]  M. Ford,et al.  Degree Progress of Women Doctoral Students: Factors that Constrain, Facilitate, and Differentiate , 2004 .

[17]  T. Wright.  Postgraduate research students: People in context? , 2003 .

[18]  C. Manathunga,et al.  Clutch-Starting Stalled Research Students , 2003 .

[19]  M. Friedlander,et al.  A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective. , 2001 .

[20]  Rosemary Deem,et al.  Doctoral Students' Access to Research Cultures-are some more unequal than others? , 2000 .

[21]  Toni Wright,et al.  Factors Influencing Successful Submission of PhD Theses , 2000 .

[22]  Chris M. Golde.  Should I Stay or Should I Go? Student Descriptions of the Doctoral Attrition Process , 2000 .

[23]  D. Rennie,et al.  A Grounded Theory of Thesis Blocking , 1987 .

[24]  L. McAlpine,et al.  Tracking the Doctoral Student Experience over Time: Cultivating Agency in Diverse Spaces , 2011 .

[25]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Living and Imagining Academic Identities , 2010 .

[26]  L. McAlpine,et al.  Doctoral student experience: activities and difficulties influencing identity development , 2009 .

[27]  Catherine Manathunga,et al.  The development of research supervision: “Turning the light on a private space” , 2005 .

[28]  Ernest Rudd,et al.  The Drop-Outs and the Dilatory on the Road to the Doctorate. , 1986 .