Allosterically coupled conformational dynamics in solution prepare the sterol transfer protein StarD4 to release its cargo upon interaction with target membranes

Complex mechanisms regulate the cellular distribution of cholesterol, a critical component of eukaryote membranes involved in regulation of membrane protein functions directly and through the physiochemical properties of membranes. StarD4, a member of the steroidogenic acute regulator-related lipid-transfer (StART) domain (StARD)-containing protein family, is a highly efficient sterol-specific transfer protein involved in cholesterol homeostasis. Its mechanism of cargo loading and release remains unknown despite recent insights into the key role of phosphatidylinositol phosphates in modulating its interactions with target membranes. We have used large-scale atomistic Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to study how the dynamics of cholesterol bound to the StarD4 protein can affect interaction with target membranes, and cargo delivery. We identify the two major cholesterol (CHL) binding modes in the hydrophobic pocket of StarD4, one near S136&S147 (the Ser-mode), and another closer to the putative release gate located near W171, R92&Y117 (the Trp-mode). We show that conformational changes of StarD4 associated directly with the transition between these binding modes facilitate the opening of the gate. To understand the dynamics of this connection we apply a machine-learning algorithm for the detection of rare events in MD trajectories (RED), which reveals the structural motifs involved in the opening of a front gate and a back corridor in the StarD4 structure occurring together with the spontaneous transition of CHL from the Ser-mode of binding to the Trp-mode. Further analysis of MD trajectory data with the information-theory based NbIT method reveals the allosteric network connecting the CHL binding site to the functionally important structural components of the gate and corridor. Mutations of residues in the allosteric network are shown to affect the performance of the allosteric connection. These findings outline an allosteric mechanism which prepares the CHL-bound StarD4 to release and deliver the cargo when it is bound to the target membrane.

[1]  H. Weinstein,et al.  Phosphatidylinositol phosphates modulate interactions between the StarD4 sterol trafficking protein and lipid membranes , 2022, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  H. Weinstein,et al.  Ligand-Dependent Conformational Transitions in Molecular Dynamics Trajectories of GPCRs Revealed by a New Machine Learning Rare Event Detection Protocol , 2021, Molecules.

[3]  B. J. Clark,et al.  The START-domain proteins in intracellular lipid transport and beyond , 2020, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[4]  O. Elemento,et al.  Stable reduction of STARD4 alters cholesterol regulation and lipid homeostasis. , 2020, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids.

[5]  Y. Im,et al.  Structural analysis of human sterol transfer protein STARD4. , 2019, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[6]  T. Levine,et al.  Lipid transfer proteins: the lipid commute via shuttles, bridges and tubes , 2018, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[7]  D. P. Valverde,et al.  Molecular basis for sterol transport by StART‐like lipid transfer domains , 2018, The EMBO journal.

[8]  D. Eliezer,et al.  Structural basis of sterol binding and transport by a yeast StARkin domain , 2018, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  Y. Im,et al.  Structural basis of sterol recognition and nonvesicular transport by lipid transfer proteins anchored at membrane contact sites , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  F. Maxfield,et al.  Role of STARD4 in sterol transport between the endocytic recycling compartment and the plasma membrane , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics , 2016, bioRxiv.

[12]  P. Lavigne,et al.  STARD6 on steroids: solution structure, multiple timescale backbone dynamics and ligand binding mechanism , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[13]  F. Maxfield,et al.  STARD4 Membrane Interactions and Sterol Binding , 2015, Biochemistry.

[14]  P. Lavigne,et al.  The binding site specificity of STARD4 subfamily: Breaking the cholesterol paradigm , 2015, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[15]  F. Maxfield,et al.  Cholesterol trafficking and distribution. , 2015, Essays in biochemistry.

[16]  R. McGibbon,et al.  Variational cross-validation of slow dynamical modes in molecular kinetics. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[17]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  N-body Information Theory (NbIT) Analysis of Rigid-Body Dynamics in Intracellular Loop 2 of the 5-HT2A Receptor , 2014, IWBBIO.

[18]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  NbIT - A New Information Theory-Based Analysis of Allosteric Mechanisms Reveals Residues that Underlie Function in the Leucine Transporter LeuT , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  R. Altman,et al.  Cloud-based simulations on Google Exacycle reveal ligand-modulation of GPCR activation pathways , 2013, Nature chemistry.

[20]  Diwakar Shukla,et al.  Activation pathway of Src kinase reveals intermediate states as targets for drug design , 2014 .

[21]  Toni Giorgino,et al.  Identification of slow molecular order parameters for Markov model construction. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[22]  F. Maxfield,et al.  STARD4 knockdown in HepG2 cells disrupts cholesterol trafficking associated with the plasma membrane, ER, and ERC , 2012, Journal of Lipid Research.

[23]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Simple few-state models reveal hidden complexity in protein folding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  F. Maxfield,et al.  STARD4 abundance regulates sterol transport and sensing , 2011, Molecular biology of the cell.

[25]  Thomas J Lane,et al.  MSMBuilder2: Modeling Conformational Dynamics at the Picosecond to Millisecond Scale. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[26]  P. Hylemon,et al.  Subcellular localization and regulation of StarD4 protein in macrophages and fibroblasts. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[27]  H. Schüler,et al.  Comparative Structural Analysis of Lipid Binding START Domains , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Frank Noé,et al.  Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  Sotaro Fuchigami,et al.  Slow dynamics in protein fluctuations revealed by time-structure based independent component analysis: the case of domain motions. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[30]  P. Martin,et al.  Cytosolic StAR‐related lipid transfer domain 4 (STARD4) protein influences keratinocyte lipid phenotype and differentiation status , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.

[31]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[32]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask. , 2010, Methods.

[33]  F. Maxfield,et al.  Cholesterol, the central lipid of mammalian cells. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[34]  A. Berezhkovskii,et al.  Reactive flux and folding pathways in network models of coarse-grained protein dynamics. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[35]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Binding and release of cholesterol in the Osh4 protein of yeast , 2009, Proteins.

[36]  J. McDonald,et al.  Switch-like control of SREBP-2 transport triggered by small changes in ER cholesterol: a delicate balance. , 2008, Cell metabolism.

[37]  F. Noé,et al.  Transition networks for modeling the kinetics of conformational change in macromolecules. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  W. Prinz Non-vesicular sterol transport in cells. , 2007, Progress in lipid research.

[39]  B. Roux,et al.  Modeling the structure of the StART domains of MLN64 and StAR proteins in complex with cholesterol1s⃞ Published, JLR Papers in Press, September 21, 2006. , 2006, Journal of Lipid Research.

[40]  F. Maxfield,et al.  Intracellular sterol transport and distribution. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[41]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[42]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Use of an Induced Fit Receptor Structure in Virtual Screening , 2006, Chemical biology & drug design.

[43]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[44]  C. Tomasetto,et al.  Give lipids a START: the StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain in mammals , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[45]  P. Deuflhard,et al.  Robust Perron cluster analysis in conformation dynamics , 2005 .

[46]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  FAST: A novel protein structure alignment algorithm , 2004, Proteins.

[47]  J. Breslow,et al.  Intracellular Cholesterol Transport , 2004, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[48]  A. Mathieu,et al.  Insights into steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR)-dependent cholesterol transfer in mitochondria: evidence from molecular modeling and structure-based thermodynamics supporting the existence of partially unfolded states of StAR. , 2002, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[49]  Stephen K. Burley,et al.  Crystal structure of the Mus musculus cholesterol-regulated START protein 4 (StarD4) containing a StAR-related lipid transfer domain , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Rachel M. Adams,et al.  The cholesterol-regulated StarD4 gene encodes a StAR-related lipid transfer protein with two closely related homologues, StarD5 and StarD6 , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  F. Maxfield,et al.  Vesicular and Non-vesicular Sterol Transport in Living Cells , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  J. Hurley,et al.  Structure and lipid transport mechanism of a StAR-related domain , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[53]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[54]  A Sali,et al.  Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1996, Molecular medicine today.

[55]  Schuster,et al.  Separation of a mixture of independent signals using time delayed correlations. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[56]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.