Stress tests for a road network using fragility functions and functional capacity loss functions

A quantitative approach to conduct a specific type of stress test on road networks is presented in this article. The objective is to help network managers determine whether their networks would perform adequately during and after the occurrence of hazard events. Conducting a stress test requires (i) modifying an existing risk model (i.e., a model to estimate the probable consequences of hazard events) by representing at least one uncertainty in the model with values that are considerably worse than median or mean values, and (ii) developing criteria to conclude if the network has an adequate post-hazard performance. Specifically, the stress test conducted in this work is focused on the uncertain behavior of individual objects that are part of a network when these are subjected to hazard loads. Here, the relationships between object behavior and hazard load are modeled using fragility functions and functional capacity loss functions. To illustrate the quantitative approach, a stress test is conducted for an example road network in Switzerland, which is affected by floods and rainfall-triggered mudflows. Beyond the focus of the stress test, this work highlights the importance of using a probabilistic approach when conducting stress tests for temporal and spatially distributed networks.

[1]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  A Simulation and Visualization Environment for Spatiotemporal Disaster Risk Assessments of Network Infrastructures , 2017, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[2]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Climate and other scenarios disrupt priorities in several management perspectives , 2014, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[3]  Keith Porter,et al.  A Beginner’s Guide to Fragility, Vulnerability, and Risk , 2016 .

[4]  Fulvio Parisi,et al.  A compendium of existing vulnerability and fragility relationships for flood : preliminary results , 2015 .

[5]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Resilience Analytics with Application to Power Grid of a Developing Region , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Final Model, Methodology and Information Exchange , 2016 .

[7]  P. Mani,et al.  Murganggefahr und Klimaänderung - ein GIS-basierter Ansatz , 1997 .

[8]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Functional Loss Assessment and Restoration Analysis to Quantify Indirect Consequences of Hazards , 2016 .

[9]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Risk-Informed Investment for Tropical Cyclone Preparedness of Highway Signs, Signals, and Lights , 2013 .

[10]  Rade Hajdin,et al.  Methodology to Determine Optimal Intervention Strategies for Structures Adversely Affected by Latent Processes , 2009 .

[11]  J. David Cummins,et al.  Catastrophe Risk Financing in Developing Countries: Principles for Public Intervention , 2008 .

[12]  Li Li,et al.  Stress Test of Roadway Network Capacity , 2009, 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering.

[13]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[14]  L. A. Arneson Evaluating Scour at Bridges , 2013 .

[16]  Nam Lethanh,et al.  The use of MINLP to determine optimal preservation strategies for road links composed of pavement sections and bridges , 2012 .

[17]  Dina D'Ayala,et al.  Development of Bayesian Networks for the multi-hazard fragility assessment of bridge systems , 2016 .

[18]  Dina D'Ayala,et al.  Integrated multi-hazard framework for the fragility analysis of roadway bridges , 2015 .

[19]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Development of flood and mudflow events for the spatio-temporal risk , 2017 .

[20]  A. Badoux,et al.  The Swiss flood and landslide damage database 1972–2007 , 2009 .

[21]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Ensuring acceptable levels of infrastructure related risks due to natural hazards with emphasis on conducting stress tests , 2016 .

[22]  Sotiris Argyroudis,et al.  The physical vulnerability of roads to debris flows: an expert judgement approach , 2013 .

[23]  Nam Lethanh,et al.  A model for the evaluation of intervention strategies for bridges affected by manifest and latent deterioration processes , 2015 .

[24]  Arlen Feldman,et al.  Closure of "Evolution of Clark’s Unit Graph Method to Spatially Distributed Runoff" , 1999 .

[25]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[26]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Climate and Related Uncertainties Influencing Research and Development Priorities , 2015 .

[27]  Sybil Derrible,et al.  Impact analysis of extreme events on flows in spatial networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[28]  Adrian M. Altenhoff,et al.  A gridded hourly precipitation dataset for Switzerland using rain‐gauge analysis and radar‐based disaggregation , 2010 .

[29]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  GPU-Accelerated Rendering Methods to Visually Analyze Large-Scale Disaster Simulation Data , 2017, Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis.

[30]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Asset Risk Management and Resilience for Flood Control, Hydropower, and Waterways , 2016 .

[31]  Stanley R. Davis,et al.  Evaluating scour at bridges. , 1995 .

[32]  L. W. Zevenbergen,et al.  Evaluating Scour at Bridges, Fifth Edition , 2012 .

[33]  Jordi Corominas,et al.  An expert judgement approach to determining the physical vulnerability of roads to debris flow , 2014, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[34]  B. Adey,et al.  Comparison of Three Preventive Maintenance Models to Determine Optimal Intervention Strategies for Transportation Infrastructures in Alpine Regions , 2016 .